Текст
                    MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022
www.independent.co.uk
The
Rob Merrick
Tories urge PM on
EU defence pact
Mariupol residents ‘deported’ to Russia
A man is stopped and searched by armed pro-Russian separatists at a checkpoint in the southern port city
Sunak rewrites budget as
cost of living crisis grows
Chancellor under pressure to act on hikes in energy and fuel bills
EXCLUSIVE
ANDREW WOODCOCK
POLITICAL EDITOR
Rishi Sunak has ordered last-
minute changes to
Wednesday’s mini-Budget
after being warned he faces a
Zoe Tidman
Adverts exaggerate
green credentials
Caroline Bullock
Coffee shops are
bad value for money
“moment of truth” this week
on the cost-of-living crisis. The
Office for Budget
Responsibility has been told to
recalculate fiscal forecasts to
take into account amended
Treasury plans, an unusual
move, The Independent has
Mark Critchley
Liverpool to face
City in cup semi
learnt. The chancellor
signalled yesterday that he is
preparing to offer relief to
families and businesses which
face soaring prices, possibly
with a cut to fuel duty. He said
“Where we can make a
difference, of course we will.”

MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News targe TING Editorials The challenge confronting Sunak this week is not one to be shirked
Expectations management appeared to be the name of the game for the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, as he made his way around the weekend political television shows. “I can’t solve every problem,” said Mr Sunak as he urged people not to be scared by the rising cost of living. “Where we can make a difference of course we will,” he added, while acknowledging that things are “not going to be easy” and that whatever he announces in this week’s spring statement will not be enough to “fully protect” people from the financial pain of rises in the cost of petrol, heating and other essentials. Mr Sunak, as a number of other government ministers have done recently, admitted that sanctions imposed against Russia are “not cost-free” and will have an impact. Anybody that has watched events in the Ukrainian city of Mariupol, which the country’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, labelled “a terror that will be remembered for centuries to come”, is unlikely to begrudge the sanctions regime that is being imposed. However, it also cannot be used by the government as a blanket excuse for issues that were in motion long before Russia invaded its neighbour. Businesses and unions have told The Independent that the chancellor is facing “a moment of truth” in the cost of living crisis, and it is difficult to argue against that. The government cannot stick its head in the sand: there is a real need for action, not excuses. We have also reported that Mr Sunak has ordered last-minute changes to Wednesday’s mini- Budget, with the Office for Budget Responsibility told - in a highly unusual move - to recalculate its fiscal forecasts to take into account amended Treasury plans. Pressure is building on the chancellor, with dozens of Tory MPs calling for a cut in fuel duty to reduce the cost of a tank or petrol or diesel. The shadow chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has said that Labour would support such a cut but that such a move does not “rise to the scale of the challenge we face”. Labour wants to reverse next month’s 1.25 per cent hike in national insurance contributions on employers and employees,
while the British Chambers of Commerce says the measure should be delayed for at least a year. However, there appears little sign that Mr Sunak is ready to back down on the planned rise. The chancellor has said that “people can judge me by my actions over the past two years”. In a singular aspect at least - increasing spending to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic - Mr Sunak and the government acted the way they needed to. But it is clear that further action has to be taken. Yes, the capacity to spend is not endless - but given all the political capital the government has tried to build over promises of a “levelling up” agenda across the country, it cannot let the many that need help now fall by the wayside. Mr Sunak should not shirk the challenge when he lays out his plans this week. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News/ Exclusive Urgent action demanded as cost of living crisis deepens ‘He’s going to have to pick sides’: Sunak’s mini-Budget is to be revealed on Wednesday (PA) ANDREW WOODCOCK POLITICAL EDITOR Rishi Sunak has ordered last-minute changes to Wednesday’s mini-Budget after being warned he faces a “moment of truth” this week on the cost-of-living crisis.
The Independent has learnt that the Office for Budget Responsibility has been told to recalculate fiscal forecasts to take into account amended Treasury plans, a highly unusual move. The chancellor signalled yesterday that he is preparing to offer relief to families and businesses faced with soaring prices, declaring: “Where we can make a difference, of course we will.” There was speculation that help may come in the form of cuts in fuel duties, after he said he did not want prices at the pump to be “prohibitively expensive”. But there are fears among businesses and unions, and on the Conservative backbenches, that any package will fail to match the urgency of the crisis, with the chancellor suspected to be holding back big measures for the autumn Budget or squirrelling away cash for pre-election tax cuts. Mr Sunak himself appeared to concede in advance that his intervention will fall short of what is needed, saying that he “can’t solve every problem” and that surging inflation was “out of my control”. British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) director general Shevaun Haviland told The Independent that the next few weeks are “crunch time” for businesses and that Wednesday’s announcements will make the difference for some between thriving and going under. The gas and electricity price spike is now a threat to all small businesses, not just those with energy-intensive activities, she said, pointing to one Cambridgeshire company whose annual bill had risen from £14,000 to £46,000. Many are being moved off fixed tariffs onto variable rates, making it impossible for them to plan for the future, she said. For the first time since its inception in 1989, she said that small businesses interviewed for the BCC’s quarterly economic survey have named inflation as their biggest concern for three quarters in succession. The BCC is calling for next month’s 1.25 per cent hike in national insurance on employers and employees to be delayed
for at least a year, as well as the imposition of an energy price cap for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). “We have told the chancellor that this isn’t business as usual any more,” said Ms Haviland. “This isn’t just a cost-of-living crisis, it’s a cost of doing business crisis. “It is essential to delay the national insurance increase. It’s not too late. The autumn is absolutely too late. We need action now.” Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the TUG, said that Wednesday’s spring statement was a “moment of truth” when the credibility of government claims to be levelling up and delivering a high-wage economy was at stake. Calling on the chancellor to use a windfall tax on North Sea oil and gas companies to fund a generous package of support for families and businesses, Ms O’Grady said: “We have got a government that’s in danger of being accused of being all mouth and no trousers. “It promised a high-wage economy and what we have got is working families under intolerable pressure after years of pay stagnation and cuts to social security. Half-measures aren’t going to cut it. “The chancellor is going to have to pick sides. Is he for the ordinary people or the oil and gas company profits?” Influential Tory backbencher Robert Halfon, who has gathered 50 MPs’ signatures in a letter asking the chancellor to cut fuel duty rates, agreed that action was needed immediately to mitigate the impact of spiralling prices. Mr Halfon said that voters are “living in fear” as they see eye- watering rises in the cost of everything from gas and electricity to council tax, filling their cars, TV subscriptions and the weekly shop. “I always get letters and emails from people who are not happy about one issue or another,” he said. “The big difference now is that people are absolutely terrified because of the bills they are getting.
“People are living in genuine fear. If we are not careful we could go back into a de facto lockdown because people won’t be able to afford to take their kids to school, they won’t be able to afford to go to work, they won’t be able to afford to go out to see friends.” War in Ukraine has fuelled an inflationary spiral already under way as a result of supply chain disruption and shortages of labour and commodities in the wake of the Covid pandemic, as well as - in the UK - the impact of Brexit red tape. An average <£700 rise in domestic gas and electricity bills in April is now expected to be followed by a further hike of as much as £1,000 in the autumn, bringing typical annual charges close to £3,000. Already above 5 per cent, there were warnings this week from the Bank of England that the crucial Consumer Prices Index (CPI) measure of inflation could reach double figures for the first time in 40 years, at a time when the cost of borrowing is also rising. And Ms O’Grady said that ordinary working families were bearing the brunt of the crisis. “Over the last 14 years we have had the longest squeeze on wages for 200 years,” she said. “We are now seeing energy bills rising at 14 times the pace of wages. “Working families have sacrificed through the crash, through austerity, through the pandemic. We are absolutely determined that working people are not going to pay the price yet again.” Immediate measures the chancellor could announce on Wednesday to alleviate financial woes include a £10 national minimum wage and a pay rise for public sector workers to match or beat inflation, she said. And she called on ministers to convene talks between unions and bosses in key sectors like social care to thrash out a fair reward for long-underpaid staff. “This is a really important moment, the moment of truth for this government,” said Ms O’Grady. “We’ve heard the rhetoric, let’s see what you are actually going to do. If you really believe in levelling up, if you really believe in
a high-wage economy, the time for action is now.” CBI director general Tony Danker said Mr Sunak must put green energy and insulation at the heart of any support package, to drive investment and growth in the key sectors needed to end the UK’s reliance on fossil fuels. “The time for action is now to not only mitigate as best we can, but also set the UK on a higher trajectory of economic growth,” said Mr Danker. “The chancellor may have wanted to delay taking decisive moves on the economy but that no longer makes sense. “This is a chance for the chancellor to signal that the UK can continue to grow independent of Mr Putin’s actions. “We need to now go full throttle in pursuit of green growth. It was always good for humanity but it’s now essential for national security. It’s also the greatest economic opportunity for businesses to thrive and to level up the United Kingdom.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Thousands fleeing Mariupol forced to travel to Russia Residents of the southern port city prepare to leave yesterday (Reuters) KIERAN GUILBERT Russia has been accused of bombing an art school providing shelter to hundreds of civilians in the besieged city of Mariupol and of deporting thousands of residents to an unknown fate inside Russian territory as Ukrainian president Volodymyr
Zelensky warns of a third world war if talks with Vladimir Putin fail. The southeastern port city has suffered the most brutal siege of Russia’s invasion, and many of its 400,000 residents have been trapped for more than two weeks with scant food, water and power as Mr Putin seeks to establish a land corridor to the Crimea peninsula it annexed from Ukraine in 2014. Last night Russia urged residents to lay down their arms in Mariupol, promising safe passage out of the city if they agree, giving them hours to respond. Russia's Ministry of Defence called for surrender by 05:00 local time (03:00 GMT) this morning, a proposal that Ukraine rejected. Irina Vereshchuk, the Ukrainian deputy prime minister, said: “There can be no talk of any surrender, laying down of arms. We have already informed the Russian side about this,” she told the news outlet Ukrainian Pravda. Local officials said “several thousand” residents have been taken to Russia in the past week. The apparent attack on the art school - where some 400 people were thought to be sheltering - came just days after Ukrainian officials reported a strike on a theatre in Mariupol, and more than 1,000 people were said to still be trapped in a bomb shelter under the building as of Friday. In this satellite photo, buildings burn after Russian strikes on a district of Mariupol (Planet Labs PBC via AP)
At least 2,300 people have died in Mariupol, some of whom had to be buried in mass graves, according to local officials, while Mr Zelensky called the bombardment of the city a war crime. "To do this to a peaceful city ... is a terror that will be remembered for centuries to come," the Ukrainian leader said in his nightly address to the nation on Saturday. "The more Russia uses terror against Ukraine, the worse the consequences for it." Nevertheless, he said peace talks with Moscow were necessary, and warned that there would be severe consequences if they failed. “I think that we have to use any format, any chance in order to have the possibility of negotiating, the possibility of talking to Putin,” Mr Zelensky told CNN yesterday. “But if these attempts fail, that would mean that this is a third world war.” Russian invasion of Ukraine LITHUANIA - • Minsk BELARUS RUSSIA Donetsk & Luhansk (part-occupied by pro-Russian rebels B > since 2014) POLAND Wa rsaw Lviv Ukrainian territory believed controlled by Russia, at end of Mar 17 Areas of Ukraine in which Russia has launched attacks but does not control, as of Mar 17 Nato member Chernobyl _JT • 9 Kharkiv Kyiv UKRAINE • Myrhorod Dnipro ♦ Mykolaiv» MOLDOVA Г A ROMANIA Bucharest FA graphic. Source: Institute for the Study of War ♦Mariupol «Melitopol Kherson Odesa Crimea (annexed by Russia in 2014) Black Sea This map shows the extent of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (PA) Turkey, which is attempting to mediate a ceasefire, said Russia and Ukraine were getting closer to agreement on "critical" issues. Kyiv is willing to drop its bid to join Nato but wants certain security guarantees from Russia. Moscow is pressing for Ukraine’s complete demilitarisation.
Later yesterday, Mr Zelensky addressed Israel’s parliament by video link and questioned its reluctance to sell missile defences to his country or sanction Russia for the invasion. In the speech, he likened the “final solution” that Nazi Germany sought to impose on the Jews to Moscow’s ambitions for Ukraine. Demonstrators gather in Tel Aviv for a televised video address by Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky (AFP) More than weeks into the invasion, the Russian advance on Ukraine's major cities appears to have stalled. The Kremlin’s forces are instead concentrating efforts on artillery and missiles strikes, with analysts and western intelligence saying that Mr Putin has turned to a war of attrition that could result in many more civilian casualties. The front lines between Ukrainian and Russian forces are "practically frozen" as Russia does not have enough combat strength to advance further, Mr Zelensky’s adviser Oleksiy Arestovych said yesterday. "[Over the past day] there were practically no rocket strikes on [Ukrainian] cities," he said. However, Mr Arestovych conceded that “there is currently no military solution to Mariupol” where fighting continued yesterday. The Russian governor of Sevastopol, which Moscow annexed from Ukraine in 2014, said that Post Captain Andrei Paliy,
deputy commander of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, had been killed in battle in Mariupol. A block of destroyed flats in Mariupol (Reuters) Mariupol’s city council issued a statement late on Saturday claiming that thousands of its residents had been “deported” to Russia in the last week. The US envoy to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, called the reports "disturbing" and "unconscionable" if true. Russian news agencies said buses had carried hundreds of people Moscow calls refugees from Mariupol to Russia in recent days. Liz Truss, the foreign secretary, tweeted that she is “appalled” at reports some residents had been forcibly taken to Russia and said Putin would be “held to account” for “Russian atrocities”. Nearly 40,000 people have left the city - of their own will - in recent days despite the bombardment, according to local authorities. That amounts to nearly a tenth of the city’s pre-war population of 430,000. “There is no city anymore,” Marina Galla told the Associated Press after escaping Mariupol, weeping in the doorway of a crowded train compartment that was pulling into the western city of Lviv near the Polish border.
Ukrainians in Lviv display solidarity with the residents of Mariupol (Getty Images) Elsewhere in Ukraine, authorities in Kharkiv said five people, including a nine-year-old boy, were killed in overnight shelling, while the country’s human rights ombudswoman Lyudmyla Denisova claimed that more than 50 elderly people were killed in Luhansk region after a Russian tank fired at a care home. Russia’s defence ministry said cruise missiles were launched from ships in the Black Sea and Caspian Sea, as well as hypersonic missiles from Crimean airspace. The Kremlin said the nuclear capable Kinzhal missile hit a Ukrainian fuel depot in Kostiantynivka, a city near Mykolaiv, yesterday, a day after it reported using the weapon for the first time to destroy an ammunition depot in Ivano-Frankivsk, western Ukraine. Meanwhile, the UN has confirmed at least 902 civilian deaths in the war, and said that more than 10 million people had now been displaced across Ukraine, including some 3.4 million who have fled to neighbouring countries such as Poland. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Sunak rejects PM’s Brexit and Ukraine comparison The chancellor made the comments during an interview yesterday (Sky News) ANDREW WOODCOCK POLITICAL EDITOR Rishi Sunak has distanced himself from Boris Johnson’s comparison of the Ukraine war with Brexit, saying the two situations are “not directly analogous”. Mr Johnson’s comments in a speech to the Conservative spring conference in Blackpool sparked fury, with one European statesmen branding it “disgraceful” and another describing it as offensive to those fighting the Russian invasion.
There were calls for the prime minister to be excluded from this week’s European Council meeting, where Mr Johnson is hoping to join EU leaders to discuss the Ukraine crisis with US president Joe Biden. In an awkward exchange on Sky News’s Sophy Ridge on Sunday, the chancellor declined to repeat the parallel made by the prime minister, insisting that Mr Johnson himself had not intended to draw a direct comparison. “I don’t think those two situations are directly analogous,” said Mr Sunak. “Clearly they are not directly analogous and I don’t think the prime minister was saying they are directly analogous.” Mr Sunak was shown footage of Mr Johnson’s speech, in which the PM said that the world faced a moment of choice between “freedom and oppression” and criticised those who believe it is necessary to “make accommodations with tyranny”. He continued: "I know that it’s the instinct of the people of this country, like the people of Ukraine, to choose freedom every time. “When the British people voted for Brexit in such large, large numbers, I don’t believe it was because they were remotely hostile to foreigners. It’s because they wanted to be free to do things differently and for this country to be able to run itself." His comments - apparently drawing a parallel between membership of the EU and Russian “tyranny” - came just days after Ukraine officially applied for EU membership. Asked whether he would have used the prime minister’s words, Mr Sunak indicated he would not, adding: “I don’t think the prime minister did either.” Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, called on Mr Johnson to apologise for his “crass” remarks. Ms Reeves told Ridge on Sunday: “It is utterly distasteful and insulting to compare the fight for freedom against the aggression of the Russian state to the decision to leave the EU.
“It is insulting to the Ukrainian people, who are fighting for their very freedom and their very lives, and it is insulting to the British people as well. “If the prime minister didn’t mean that analogy, he shouldn’t have made it and he should take those words back and apologise to the Ukrainian people and the British people for those crass remarks.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News/ Exclusive War pushing Britain’s aid budget to ‘breaking point’ Campaigners say Foreign Office cuts leave UK unable to meet all international obligations (AP) ANDREW WOODCOCK Anti-poverty campaigners have warned that war in Ukraine is stretching the UK’s overseas aid budget “to breaking point”. Researchers from the ONE Campaign said the Russian invasion has destroyed the government’s rationale for cutting aid spending from the level of 0.7 per cent to 0.5 per cent of gross national income in 2020.
The non-profit group has called on chancellor Rishi Sunak to bring forward the planned restoration of the 0.7 per cent figure, warning that failure to do so will mean life-saving programmes will be withdrawn from some of the world’s poorest nations. The Ukraine war means that the UK will no longer be able to meet its strategic priorities and international obligations within the reduced budget, it added. Some £220m of UK aid money has been diverted so far to meet immediate humanitarian needs in Ukraine. Meanwhile, the disruption to Ukrainian wheat exports, which make up 10 per cent of global supply, has sent food prices soaring around the world, including in developing countries. ONE UK director Romilly Greenhill said it was “absolutely the case” that refugees fleeing Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine need to be supported as much as people facing famine in east Africa do. But she said “by keeping our aid budget unnecessarily reduced, the UK is not in a position to do both; it’s forcing itself into a situation where it has to choose between people in crisis,” adding that “we’re seeing a convergence of crises that mean you can’t just pick and choose which problem to deal with in a vacuum”. The aid cut - equivalent to <£4.5bn a year - was described as a “temporary” measure. Mr Sunak has said he hopes to restore spending to its previous level in 2024-25, but Ms Greenhill said this timetable needs to be accelerated. A report by ONE found that a series of humanitarian disasters, including the Ukraine refugee crisis and the controversial decision to include Covid vaccines in the aid budget, had made the argument for the cut increasingly “out of date”. The group’s report comes days before Mr Sunak’s mini-budget statement on Wednesday and ahead of the expected publication of the Foreign Office’s international development strategy. "We’re in a different place to when the aid budget was first cut,” said Ms Greenhill. “Since the chancellor announced the cut in 2020, circumstances have changed, and the justification that was used then no longer holds. The government cannot deliver
on its own agenda at the current budget, and with more and more spend being added, UK aid is being stretched to breaking point. It’s pushing existing anti-poverty work out.” ONE’S analysis, carried out before the invasion of Ukraine, found that the decision to cut UK aid meant 4 million fewer girls will have access to a decent education and that 1 million women and children under five will be at risk of malnutrition. It also found that aid to low-income countries like Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan and Yemen had been slashed, while some middle-income countries like China and Brazil saw a rise in funds received. UK overseas development aid to Ethiopia fell by 55 per cent from =£240.5m in 2020-21 to =£107.5m in 2021-22, while China’s funding rose from £2.2m to ^13.7m in the same period, the report found. The Independent has approached the Foreign Office for comment. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Temporary measures: Ukrainians at a sports stadium in the Polish village of Medyka (AP) ZAINA ALIBHAI The war in Ukraine has seen millions of people forced to flee their homes for safety in neighbouring countries. However, at the Polish border with Ukraine reports are emerging of many, including women and children, returning to Ukraine despite the risks.
One couple had been on holiday when the invasion happened and were returning to be with family who had stayed put, Sky News reports. Another woman, Valentina Puzanova, said she travelled to Poland to take her elderly mother and young son to safety, and was heading back to be with her husband. And the Bilechenko family, including a mother, father and their four children, said they are heading back after two weeks in Poland as the draw to be home “outweighs the risk”. The United Nations estimates that since Russian troops first entered Ukraine on 24 February, 3,270,662 have left the country, the majority of whom have gone to Poland. Ninety per cent of them are women and children. The Kyiv Independent estimates more than 320,000 Ukrainians have returned since the beginning of the war, most of whom were men who wanted to defend their country. The UN has warned that humanitarian needs are becoming ever-more urgent, with 200,000 people now without access to water across Donetsk and 100,000 people with no electricity in Luhansk, due to heavy shelling. Poland has welcomed more than 2 million Ukrainian refugees so far (AP) Residents in Mariupol and Sumy are facing a critical shortage of food, water and medicine, while in Odesa authorities have appealed for support for the 450,000 people in the city.
Ukraine’s deputy prime minister Iryna Vereshchuk said seven humanitarian corridors would open on Sunday to enable civilians to leave frontline areas. The UN estimates at least 847 civilians have been killed and 1,399 wounded as of Friday, with the Ukrainian prosecutor general’s office claiming 112 children to have been killed. The Independent has a proud history of campaigning for the rights of the most vulnerable, and we first ran our Refugees Welcome campaign during the war in Syria in 201g. Now, as we renew our campaign and launch this petition in the wake of the unfolding Ukrainian crisis, we are calling on the government to go further and faster to ensure help is delivered. To find out more about our Refugees Welcome campaign, click here. To sign the petition click here. If you would like to donate then please click here for our GoFundMe page Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Tory group urges Johnson to rejoin EU defence pact The Conservative European Forum calls for closer military cooperation (Anadolu Agency/Getty) ROB MERRICK DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR The Ukraine crisis shows Boris Johnson must drop his opposition to a defence pact with the EU to allow the UK to quickly deploy forces around Europe, a Tory group says.
The Conservative European Forum (CEF) wants Britain to join projects run by an EU body called Permanent Structured Cooperation in Defence (PESCO) - a bid to create a common defence policy. As a first step, it argues that the prime minister should sign up to its Military Mobility project, to ease bureaucracy preventing the quick movement of military personnel and assets. The call comes after the UK rejected a defence and security pact in the Christmas 2020 Brexit deal - and a few days before the prime minister heads to a crucial Nato summit. The Conservatives have long opposed the UK aligning with anything that resembles an “EU army”, a controversy that helped fuel support for leaving the EU. But the CEF said Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had underlined the need to “effectively respond to existential threats” and dismissed any fears that integration will “infringe UK sovereignty”. Its report, entitled Keep Calm and Defend Europe, pushes for a Framework Participation Agreement with the EU and a separate tie-up with the European Defence Agency. The forum’s chair, former deputy prime minister David Lidington, said: “The report today highlights the changing nature of the EU’s more collective approach to security and defence. “The UK needs to understand these changes and seize on the opportunities that they present.”
Johnson is being urged to change tack on defence (PA) The report’s author, Dr Garvan Walshe, a former security policy adviser to the Conservative Party, said it was time to grasp “previously missed opportunities”. “The recent invasion of Ukraine has demonstrated the importance of logistical coordination and military mobility between allies,” he said. “Without delay, the UK should seek to join the EU’s Permanent Structured Cooperation in Defence projects that benefit UK security. “Signing up to the Military Mobility project, like the US, Canada and Norway did last year, would be an important first step.” The UK’s decision not to pursue a defence and security arm to the Brexit deal also shut down access to vital criminal databases, including records of stolen identities and wanted people. The prime minister will head to the Nato summit in Brussels on Thursday, which will be dominated by the Ukraine crisis and efforts to thwart Russia’s war on the country. His priority is thought to be securing a one-to-one meeting with the US president Joe Biden - although an invitation to attend the European Council meeting in the same city is also possible. The move would symbolise a warming of relations with the EU, brought about by cooperation after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,
after years of spats over Brexit and Covid vaccines. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Lviv vegan restaurant feeds hundreds of refugees a day Vega Room staff are cooking free meals like falafel and Stroganoff (Vega Room/Vitaly Savchuk) GINO SPOCCHIA It has never been busier for 26-year-old Vitaly and his Vega Room restaurant in Lviv, western Ukraine. The numbers at Vega Room have risen tenfold since Russia invaded on 24 February,
which forced a wave of women, children and older people to attempt to leave the country. Around 200 people will arrive at his restaurant’s door daily for a hot meal, which Vitaly admits is more than Vega Room has ever had. On the menu? Buckwheat, grains and simple food, he said. “It’s just regular soups, or we’ll do some cereals like buckwheat, rice, and some meat substitution; we just use tofu, falafel, which are very useful, actually. And people are very satisfied with them,” Vitaly told The Independent. “But on the other hand, there is actually a problem with those products, especially with tofu and with some meat substitution, because it’s difficult to find them right now.” Vitaly said his Ukrainian supplier in Kharkiv has been effectively shuttered by the war. “Nothing works now, so yeah, we cannot get all the needed products from Ukraine. And now I am asking my friends to send me some products.” A month ago, Vega Room would see about 30 or 40 customers come and go in a single day, with people enjoying plant-based pierogi, cabbage rolls and even a vegan Stroganoff. “It’s not really big,” Vitaly said from his home in Lviv, where he has taken in two families from Ukraine’s east. “It has six tables, so at the same time there could be 20 people maximum. Now it’s something like 200 a day, so for us, it’s a huge amount of people.”
The cafe used to serve around 40 customers per day - but now it is feeding around 200 people fleeing Ukraine (Vega Room/Vitaly Savchuk) The only difference now is that these people aren’t paying. Vega Room has become a vital part of the humanitarian effort underway in Lviv and elsewhere in Ukraine. “Maybe not all of them are refugees but we don’t ask them to show passports,” said Vitaly of the Monday-to-Sunday restaurant operation. “I don’t think people are trying to take advantage here - we just feed everyone.” About a month ago, Vitaly had announced the closure of his Vega Room business because of the threat of Covid and a war with Russia. “We were hearing, like almost every day, that Russia is going to attack us. But we didn’t take this seriously. No one actually expected that,” he said. “And after the war started ... I didn’t know what to do, or what the future with the restaurant is going to be because I was really surprised.” That was when he was approached by Vegan Ukraine, a charity that wanted to turn Vega Room into a kitchen for refugees fleeing Russia’s assault. He said it was spearheaded by two sisters who were regular customers of his restaurant, and who organised funding for his refugee vegan kitchen. It has provided Vega Room and now thousands of refugees with a lifeline.
“When the war started we lost our workers because some of them went to Poland. We had a waitress and she went to Poland ... they were scared of the war and so we didn’t have any choice. We decided to close it. But then this initiative came up,” said Vitaly, who has signed up to be a Ukrainian army volunteer. And his rent has been suspended by Lviv’s authorities too, which has been bracing itself for a Russian assault on one of Ukraine’s westernmost cities after an attack on a nearby military base last week. The bombing just miles from the Polish border sent shockwaves through Lviv, which has seen little of the war waged by Russia. “It was horrible,” said Vitaly, “because many people didn’t expect that, you know. Until today, we live here in a peaceful place. We didn’t expect something like this to happen.” Like all businesses in Lviv, Vega Room has been forced to adapt to the vast number of people fleeing war, with estimates suggesting some 200,000 people have settled temporarily in Ukraine’s seventh biggest city. Lviv normally has a population of about 740,000, with close ties to nearby Poland and Hungary. Some 200,000 people have settled temporarily in Ukraine’s seventh biggest city, Lviv, near the Polish border (EPA)
“There is a huge problem with humanitarian problems in the east,” explained Vitaly. “People are dying because of hunger there and the worst part is you’re totally helpless. You know, I want to contribute to those people.” Describing himself as “cosmopolitan”, the long-time vegan and business owner said while he couldn’t imagine fighting five years ago, this war is “already the second conflict because the war started in 2014 when Russia occupied Crimea”. He added some comforting words: “But to be honest, in 2014, people weren’t as united as they are now.” And he said that the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has “inspired” people. “I think if it was our previous president or the previous president like Petro Poroshenko, for example, no one would fight that strongly for the country.” As for the future, Vitaly said he hopes to fully reopen Vega Room when the war ends and that his customers - new and old - will return. “Actually I want to open as soon as possible. But right now I think we can have two conditions; the place can be closed and give some taxes, or the place can be open and feed refugees and I think this is what is most appropriate for us right now.” He added: “I hope when the war will finish, of course, we will reopen this as a normal business place.” Anybody wanting to contribute funds to Vega Ryoms refugee kitchen can contribute with donation details here Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Labour force motion to ban ‘fire and rehire’ tactics and reinstate sacked P&O staff г Sacked P&.O staff protest at Larne Port in Northern Ireland on Friday (PA) ANDREW WOODCOCK Labour is to force a vote in the Commons today to demand that ferry company P&O reinstate 800 workers sacked with no notice on Thursday.
The TUC called on MPs of all parties to back the emergency motion, which would also ban the controversial practice of “fire and rehire”. Chancellor Rishi Sunak has confirmed that a review is underway into all government contracts with the company, whose decision to replace long-serving personnel with cheaper agency staff he described as “appalling”. Unions, who will stage a protest outside parliament today, said that new crew on board ships are likely to end up on “poverty pay” well below the minimum wage. Shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh said the incident should be “a line in the sand” for workers’ rights. Her motion calls on the government to: • Outlaw fire and rehire and bring forward an urgent bill to strengthen workers rights • Suspend the contracts of P&O owners DP World until the current row is resolved • Remove DP World from the government’s Transport Advisory Group Ms Haigh said: “This scandalous action must be a line in the sand. If P&O Ferries can get away with this, it will give the green light to other exploitative employers. It is the consequence of the Tory assault on workers’ rights. A Labour government will strengthen employee protections and ban fire and rehire to give people the security they deserve for an honest day’s work. “No more excuses, [today] Tory MPs must join with Labour and vote to ban cruel fire and rehire for good. They must decide which side they are on - loyal workers in Britain or billionaires riding roughshod over rights.” TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady said: “No matter where their party loyalties lie, MPs should do the right thing and back Labour’s motion to end fire and rehire and demand the immediate reinstatement of all sacked staff. Ministers have
spent the last few days condemning P&O’s actions - now they have a chance to prove they mean it.” The RMT transport union said P&O ships on the Liverpool- Dublin route have now been crewed with Filipino ratings on contracts that pay below the minimum wage. Shipping companies that are registered in other countries and operating routes from UK ports to Europe can pay below the minimum wage because they are exempt from legislation. RMT general secretary Mick Lynch said: “P&O may pay more than the minimum wage at Erst to agency staff but they will eventually move to rates below this simply because there is nothing to stop them from doing so. We fear poverty pay will be accompanied by seafarers being chained to 12-hour-day, seven- day-week contracts that operate continuously for six months, with no pension.” A spokesperson for P&O Ferries said: “We know that for our staff this redundancy came without warning or prior consultation, and we fully understand that this has caused distress for them and their families. “We took this difficult decision as a last resort and only after full consideration of all other options, but, ultimately, we concluded that the business wouldn’t survive without fundamentally changed crewing arrangements, which in turn would inevitably result in redundancies.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Man arrested on suspicion of murder after woman, 19, found dead in student halls Police made the arrest yesterday, hours after naming the victim as Sabita Thanwani (Family Handout/SWNS) HOLLY BANCROFT
A man has been arrested on suspicion of murder after a 19-year- old woman was found dead in student halls in London. Sabita Thanwani was named by the Met Police yesterday morning after the tragic discovery in Clerkenwell on Saturday. Officers were called at around 5.10am to a report of a woman “seriously injured” at the student block. Despite emergency workers’ best efforts, Ms Thanwani was pronounced dead at the scene. Police arrested a man in connection with her death yesterday afternoon in the Clerkenwell area. He remains in police custody on suspicion of murder and assault. Detective Chief Inspector Linda Bradley, who leads the investigation, said: “Sabita’s family have been updated with this development and continue to be supported by specially trained officers. Our deepest condolences are with them. I would ask everyone to respect their privacy at this indescribably devastating time.” Fellow students living in the block shared their fears over the teenager’s death after Ms Thanwani’s body was found, and raised concerns about security in the building. Unite Students, which runs the block, said: “Our priority at this time is the safety and wellbeing of students at Arbour House”, adding that it was working with the Met and City, University of London. A spokesperson for the university said: “We will do everything we can to support our students and staff and we will continue to fully support the police with their investigation.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Father’s ‘unbearable pain’ after son dies playing rugby David Hill, pictured right with Scotland rugby coach Gregor Townsend, died playing for Holyrood RFC in Dublin on Saturday (Scottish Parliament RFC/Twitter) KATRINE BUSSEY The father of a man who died while playing rugby for the Scottish parliament team said the “pain is unbearable”.
Rodger Hill said his family is “broken” after the sudden death of David Hill on Saturday. He said on Twitter: “I can’t believe I’m writing this. My amazing son David passed away today playing rugby in Dublin for the Scottish parliament. He was the best and the pain is unbearable. We are broken.” David Hill, who was described as “rugby daft”, worked as the head of office for Scottish Tory MSP and Holyrood justice spokesperson Jamie Greene. He was playing for the cross-party Holyrood team in a match against the Dail and Seanad XV when he died. Mr Greene described him as a “friend, colleague and confidant for so many in the Scottish parliament over the years”. He said Mr Hill “loved his politics, but he loved his rugby more”, and added: “The whole parliament, my party and the whole rugby community is deeply saddened by this awful news today, and our condolences lie entirely with his family, friends and colleagues.” Mr Hill’s death prompted tributes from across Holyrood, with Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon tweeting: “This is so terribly sad. My deepest condolences to David’s family, friends and colleagues.” She said Mr Hill’s teammates are “all deeply shocked and heartbroken”. Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross said: “Our whole party is shocked and saddened by David’s tragic passing. He was a kind, generous, well-liked and highly respected part of our team. We will all miss him dearly. All our thoughts are with his family and friends.” Holyrood presiding officer Alison Johnstone said: “Words can’t express how shocked and saddened all at the Scottish parliament feel on learning of David’s sudden death. My thoughts and those of all @ScotParl are with David’s family, friends and colleagues at this difficult time.” In a statement, Scottish Rugby said: “We are shocked and saddened by David’s passing today. Described as ‘rugby daft’ by his family, David played for Dumfries Saints and was a regular at
Scotland internationals. The condolences of everyone at Scottish Rugby go out to his family and friends at this time.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News/ Exclusive Ad bans expose the dirty business of greenwashing Not so innocent: an Innocent Drinks advert was ruled as misleading by the ASA (Innocent Drinks) ZOE TIDMAN The number of adverts banned for “greenwashing” has tripled in a year, The Independent can reveal. Over the past 12 months, 16 advertising campaigns exaggerated their company’s green credentials or made environmental
claims that could not be backed up, according to analysis of thousands of rulings by the UK advertising watchdog. These ads - by Innocent Drinks, Alpro and Oatly among others - were banned from appearing again in the same form. Analysis of Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) rulings by The Independent found there had been a sharp rise in the number of adverts found to have greenwashed - both in recent months and compared to the year before. Eleven out of the 16 adverts to be banned between mid-March 2021 and March 2022 were from the first few months of this year, while the total over the past 12 months was triple the number banned during the same period the year before. Toby King, a spokesperson for the ASA, said he thought people were “more concerned” and “educated” over the climate crisis and greenwashing, which could be driving the increase in adverts being banned. “We have done a lot of work to let people know, when you see an ad for green claims, we are the guys you come to if you think it is inaccurate or may not be telling the truth,” he told The Independent. He added: “I think we are seeing a sea change in public understanding of green claims, and people want to buy ethically in a green way. We all want to do our bit.” The 16 greenwashing rulings included reprimands for multiple adverts across different platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, as well as newspaper and TV. Innocent Drinks was one such company that had its TV, YouTube and video-on-demand adverts banned last month. The ASA said the adverts, which included cartoon characters singing about “fixing up the planet” and recycling while drinking its products, implied buying Innocent products would have a “positive environmental impact when that was not the case” and were therefore misleading. Innocent said it was “disappointed” with the ruling and that the advert intended to
“highlight important global environmental issues and the need for collective action”. Adverts for Lipton Ice Tea and Aqua Рига water were also banned for misleadingly claiming their bottles were made from fully recycled materials when, in fact, the cap and label were not. A Pepsi Lipton International spokesperson claimed the advert did not “intend to mislead” but was “simply celebrating that the plastic bottle is now made from 100 per cent recycled PET”. The ASA also banned adverts from Oatly, a plant-based milk substitute company, over misleading environmental claims, including: “Oatly generates 73 per cent less CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) vs milk, calculated from grower to grocer”. Following the ruling, the company said it could have been “more specific” in how it presented scientific data. Andrew Simms from the Badvertising campaign told The Independent: “More pressure on companies due to awareness of the climate emergency means some major polluters take the easy option of trying to change their image rather than change their business. That leads to greenwash.” But he claimed that the ASA seemed to “be letting many of the big polluting fish off the hook” such as oil companies and airlines, and was instead “picking up other, smaller and relatively innocuous examples”. “More greenwashing does need investigating, but it will be perverse if the new scrutiny fails to tackle the worst polluters, and is exploited to target others trying to make a positive difference.” However, the ASA denied Simms’ accusation that it only dealt with “small fry”, saying it has also ruled against airlines and car companies. In 2020, it said three adverts by RyanAir were misleading over claims it was the “lowest emissions airline”. Following the ruling, RyanAir remained defiant, insisting it had the lowest emissions per passenger than any other carrier in Europe.
Harriet Lamb, chief executive of climate charity Ashden, told The Independent'. “Greenwashing confuses the public, minimises the severity of the global climate crisis and so ultimately pushes us closer to climate catastrophe. “The strict implementation of tight advertising regulations is vital. But we also need to go much further - advertising should be banned for companies that are highly polluting.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Warm and sunny weather forecast for most of UK Temperatures are likely to be in the mid-to-high teens for most of next week (PA) WILLIAM JANES Much of the UK can expect to see more warm weather and sunshine this week after the hottest day of the year so far. Temperatures reached 20C in some parts on Saturday for the first time since October, the Met Office said. Forecasters said there are “plenty of sunny spells to come and temperatures will rise a little bit” in the week ahead, after a cooler day yesterday.
The mercury is likely to sit at 15C-16C today but forecasters are predicting highs of 19C tomorrow, before temperatures hold steady in most of England at around 17C or 18C through the rest of the week and into the weekend - warmer than the average for March. The vast majority of the UK is set to see continued sunny spells and dry conditions, with the exception of some localised showers in the Midlands today and the north of England tomorrow. The east coast of Scotland could also see some low cloud during the week and temperatures could be cooler in coastal areas due to low sea temperatures and breezes. The north of the UK is expected to see highs of between 9C and 12C. Warmest UK March temperatures 2021 Warmest in 2010-20 Warmest on record 2022 (so far) Kinlochewe, n orth -west Scotland, Mar 19 Aboynein Aberdeenshire, Mar 27 2012 Kew Gardens in London, Mar 30 Mepai In Cambridgeshire. Mar 291968 PA graphic. Source: Met Office The pleasant conditions are due to the jet stream tracking well to the north of the UK, letting high pressure dominate from the east. Met Office meteorologist Greg Dewhurst said: “This week is going to be very similar. We’re going to keep high pressure just to the east of the UK and that means it will be largely dry and settled with plenty of sunny spells.
“There is the odd exception, there could just be an isolated shower across the Midlands on Monday, perhaps northern England on Tuesday, but they’re going to be very isolated and most places will be dry and sunny.” Mr Dewhurst added sheltered areas “will continue to be on the pleasant and warm side”. The temperature is expected to remain above average into next weekend but will then drop slightly into the following week. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News It’s wrong to smack a child, most adults in England say KATE NG The majority of adults in England believe it is wrong for parents or carers to physically discipline their child, a study has revealed. More than two-thirds (68 per cent) of nearly 3,000 adults polled by YouGov said they felt that it was unacceptable to physically punish a child, for example by smacking them. The poll, commissioned by the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), revealed that the public largely support changing the law in England to abolish “reasonable chastisement” as a defence for hitting children. From today, all types of physical punishment becomes illegal in Wales and the defence of “reasonable punishment” is no longer available to parents or caretakers. According to the study, 64 per cent of adults in England states that the law should be changed so that children have the same legal protections against assault as adults. The polling also revealed that there was a lack of clarity about the law on physical punishment. More than half (50 per cent) think it is illegal to smack your child, while 20 per cent knew it was still legal and 22 per cent did not know either way. Scotland became the first UK nation to outlaw physical punishment in 2019, joining 57 countries other countries that have done the same.
The NSPCC said that Childline delivered more than 500 counselling sessions last year where children and young people reported they were smacked or hit by parents and carers. Some children reported that the physical punishment became more severe as they got older. One 16-year-old girl told Childline that when she was younger, she would receive a warning from her mother and be “put on the naughty step”. The punishment evolved into a “tap or a little smack” between the ages of five and 12 years old. However, the child said that “now it can be a proper smack”. She also detailed an occasion on which she said her mother “pulled my hair and I fell to the floor and she continuously hit me”. “I don’t want to get mum in trouble, but I can’t continue being afraid of her,” she added. The study comes after University College London (UCL) analysed 20 years of research on the topic of physical punishment alongside a team of international experts and concluded that it was harmful to children and had no benefit. The research showed that it did not improve children’s behaviour and, in fact, increased behavioural difficulties, such as aggression and anti-social behaviour. The NSPCC is calling on the government to follow in Wales’s footsteps to abolish the defence of “reasonable punishment” for hitting a child. Sir Peter Wanless, chief executive of the charity, said: “Today is a landmark moment for children in Wales. They are some of the most vulnerable members of our society and deserve more, not less, protection from violence than adults. “The NSPCC has long campaigned to remove this outdated defence and we are pleased that children in Wales, Scotland and Jersey now have equal protection from assault. Public attitudes to physical punishment are changing and the law needs to follow suit. Westminster now needs to follow its neighbours and tackle this legal anomaly,” he added.
Dr Anja Heilmann, of the UCL Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, said that the research made it “unequivocally clear” that “physical punishment is harmful to children’s development and wellbeing”. “There is no evidence that it has any positive outcomes whatsoever,” she said. “We also know that in countries where it is no longer legal, support for physical punishment has declined dramatically, and its use is much less common. “The legislative change coming into force in Wales today sends a clear signal that physically hurting children is never acceptable. Children in England deserve the same - we hope that the law reforms in Scotland and Wales will be a catalyst for change happening there too.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Pictures of the Day Don’t be a dummy A puppet of French president Emmanuel Macron is thrown in the air during a campaign rally in Paris by far-left candidate Jean- Luc Melenchon. AP
I guess that’s why they call it the blues Dexter the Pomeranian models a design inspired Sir Elton John, during the Hollywood (A day at the Oscar’s) themed Furbabies Dog Pageant at Collingham Memorial Hall, Leeds. PA Final journey Thousands of ultra-orthodox Jews escort the body of leading Israeli ultra-orthodox Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky during his mass funeral in Bnei Brak, Israel. EPA
Happiness is the best medicine Milana, 6, plays with a person dressed as a clown, who has been visiting children at the Ohmatdyt hospital in Kyiv. Milana was injured and her mother Diana was killed on 28 February, after Russian shelling near Hostomel. EPA Sand flies The Portuguese triple-jumper Patricia Mamona at the World Athletics Indoor Championships in Belgrade, Serbia. AP Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address
BACK TO TOP л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 News Home news in brief Fire engines rushed to the nature reserve in Parkgate after suspected arson (ilovetolifti3/PA) Suspected arson attack on marshland ‘devastates’ nature reserve A huge fire on marshland which may have been started deliberately has “devastated” parts of a nature reserve, conservationists say. Firefighters rushed to the scene at Parkgate, near Neston on the Wirral, at around 6.20pm on Saturday. They found a square kilometre of marshes were in flames. Six engines were deployed with crews initially battling two areas. Later in the evening, fire breaks were set up to protect nearby properties after the blaze was left to burn due to unstable ground. It was eventually extinguished shortly before 7am yesterday. Police have been informed it is suspected that the fire was started deliberately.
A spokesperson for the RSPB, which manages the reserve, said: “We’re shocked and saddened by the fire that has devastated the Neston Reedbed part of our reserve. The reserve is home to a vast array of significant wildlife, including bearded tits, Cetti’s warblers and bitterns. Marsh harriers were also beginning to build their nests on the marshland which has sadly been lost to fire. The full extent of the damage is currently being assessed, and we’ll share further details once more information emerges. We’d like to take this opportunity to thank the emergency services for all they’ve done so far in helping to tackle and investigate the fire.” Actor Cumming recalls ‘very violent’ abuse from his father Alan Cumming has told how he felt “powerless” as he suffered abuse as a child at the hands of his father. The Spy Kids star opened up about his difficult childhood in Aberfeldy, Perthshire, during a recent appearance on Desert Island Discs. The actor told host Lauren Laverne that coping with the abuse helped him develop his skills for acting. “My dad didn’t break my spirit. I feel that the qualities you need to deal with someone who is an adult who is abusing you, and you are powerless, are good qualities for being an actor,” he said. “Listening, pretending you are not feeling what you are feeling, not showing fear.” He continued: “I always knew that I was going to get out and I was going to live the life I wanted to lead.” Cumming added that the abuse was “very violent”. He said that “you just couldn’t tell” when his father would become violent. “That’s the thing with a tyrant - constantly on edge. I could tell by the clack of his boots, the way he opened the door,” said Cumming. “Often it would be to do with my appearance or my hair. He was obsessed with my hair. When I would go to get my hair cut as an adult I would vomit.” He lost touch with his father until shortly before recording his episode of the BBC’s genealogy series Who Do You Think You Are? nearly 20 years later in 2010. Ahead of filming, the actor discovered his father believed he was not his biological son. Cumming disproved the claim with a DNA test. His father died of cancer later that year.
Woman charged with murder after body found buried in garden A woman has been charged with murder after a man’s body was found buried in a back garden. Fiona Beal was arrested at a hotel in Cumbria shortly after midnight on Wednesday after Northamptonshire Police launched a homicide investigation. The force said the body, believed to be that of a 42-year-old missing man, was found in the garden of a house in Northampton on Saturday afternoon after they were called to an address in the Kingsley area. Forensic officers and specialist search teams, including a cadaver dog, were deployed and the discovery was made after an extensive search, police added. Yesterday, two officers were guarding the front door of the property, with a forensics team going in and out of the house. Police said the remains are expected be taken to Leicester where they will be forensically examined by a Home Office pathologist. Det Ch Insp Adam Pendlebury, from the major crime team of the East Midlands Special Operations Unit, said: “Regrettably, I can confirm that a body has been found in the rear garden of the address. We believe it to be that of a missing 42-year-old male, but formal identification has yet to take place. Police officers have been conducting house-to-house enquiries in the area over the past couple of days. This remains a complex and challenging investigation and we are appealing for anyone with any information to contact Northamptonshire Police.” Ms Beal, aged 48, is due to appear at Northampton Magistrates Court this morning. BA passengers suffer fresh baggage chaos at Heathrow airport Thousands of passengers have been hit by another British Airways operations glitch at London Heathrow airport with bags not being delivered and many flights stuck on the tarmac waiting to disembark. The airline told those waiting to collect luggage on Saturday evening that no more bags would be delivered for the rest of the day. Hundreds of passengers were left waiting in the baggage hall for hours before being told to go
home without their luggage. At least 25 flights were affected, with many more also hit by delays caused by an apparent shortage of ground crew. It comes after the airline was crippled by a string of IT systems failures that caused widespread cancellations and travel misery. British Airways said in a statement: “We’ve apologised to customers whose bags have been delayed due to operational constraints. We know how frustrating this is and our teams are working incredibly hard to return luggage as soon as possible.” Lo Partridge-Smith, who arrived from Jersey, spent more than two hours waiting for her bags before being told to go home. “Took off late, landed late, waited on the tarmac for ages as no gate, pilot was baffled and apologetic, finally got gate then no one to operate jetway so waited again,” she tweeted. Last month, BA passengers criticised the “absolute chaos” after all short-haul flights were cancelled due to a major IT outage. The glitch left many other flights stuck on the tarmac for hours awaiting paperwork. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
v INDEPENDENT •5- PREMIUM I EVENT Exploring the government’s pursuit of Brexit opportunities Examining the potential prospects now the UK has left the EU, with chief political commentator John Rentoul Wednesday 6 April, 6.30pm-7.45pm To book your place today: 1. Log in to independent.co.uk 2, Click on the ffed 'My Account’ icon in the top right-hand corner of the homepage 3. Click on the 'My Independent Premium’ tab to view the event 4, Click the ‘Book tickets’ button to reserve your place
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 World Somalia’s worst drought in years raises fears of famine In political turmoil and short on cash, the country struggles to save its starving children, reports Fred Harter in Jubaland In crisis: after her daughter died from hunger, Juhara worries for the rest of her family (Supplied) On the far edge of a camp for displaced people in southern Somalia, a small grave has been dug into a patch of dusty ground. It is for four-year-old Ubah Ali, whose frail body lies a few feet away, wrapped in an orange and blue sleeping mat.
The day before, Ubah’s pregnant mother, Juhara, had taken her to a mobile health clinic on the camp. The girl had been sick for two months, so wasted by malnutrition that she could not eat solid food without vomiting. The doctors’ visit came too late. That night, Ubah had a severe bout of diarrhoea. By morning she had stopped breathing. Juhara now fears for the lives of her three other children and unborn baby. The weight of the youngest, 14-month-old Abdifatah, swings between 6kg and 10kg despite several trips to a clinic in the nearby town of Kismayo. “I am pregnant, but I do not worry for myself,” Juhara told The Independent. “I worry only for my children.” Like the thousands of others in this camp, located near the settlement of Luglow in Somalia’s Jubaland state, the family were uprooted from their home by a drought that experts believe was caused by climate change. A mourner attends the burial of four-year-old Ubah, who died from malnourishment (Fred Harter) Three successive dry seasons turned Juhara’s farmland to dust and killed her animals, leaving her penniless. She reached the camp two weeks ago after travelling for seven days, carrying her children on her back. Some residents of the camp made journeys of up to 300km. Most brought only what they could carry. “The children were better when they were back home,” said Juhara.
“When they had milk to drink, they were healthy ... in this camp, their health worsened.” In total, the UN estimates that the drought threatens the livelihoods of 13 million people in the Horn of Africa, a fragile region already wracked by conflict and increasingly prone to extreme weather events. Current conditions are the driest for more than 40 years. The impact has been particularly extreme in Somalia, where half a million people have been forced from their homes in search of aid and pasture for their animals. One-third of the 15 million- strong population is affected, with a recent assessment by Save the Children finding that 700,000 animals died in just two months last year. So far only 2.3 per cent of the UN’s humanitarian appeal of $1.46bn (ofl.llbn) for Somalia has been met. Charities have said they may have to suspend emergency relief programmes due to a lack of funding while Unicef has warned that some regions are in “near-famine”. Women collect water dispensed by a truck at Luglow camp in southern Somalia’s Jubaland region (Fred Harter) “Somalia is facing a climate disaster, and it is unfolding already in the displacement of massive populations, fleeing their homes in search of life-saving assistance,” Mohamed Ahmed, operations director at Save the Children, told The Independent. “If there is not an urgent response, it means more and more people are going to die.”
Things have been made worse by a political crisis sparked last year when the country’s president Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed - better known by his nickname Farmaajo - delayed elections initially scheduled for February 2021. His dispute with prime minister Mohamed Hussein Roble led to men armed with rocket-propelled grenades surrounding the presidential palace in December. The US has threatened visa restrictions over the instability and donors are reluctant to keep funnelling money in the stricken country. Last month, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned it could shut off funding for Somalia if there are further delays to the election. Starved of cash and caught up in political squabbles, the response of Somalia’s dysfunctional government to the drought has been sluggish. “What’s really missing here is government leadership,” said Abdiqani Jama, an economic adviser to the prime minister. “The diaspora and the international community need to be mobilised to address the drought, but everyone is distracted by the election. If we don’t act, it will be a catastrophe.” Children stand between makeshift tents at a camp for internally displaced persons (AFP via Getty) At Abdirahman Abdi Ahmed’s office in Kismayo, surrounded by high walls dressed in barbed wire to thwart suicide bombers from the Islamist group al-Shabaab, Jubaland’s minister for humanitarian affairs said his office did not have enough money
for drought relief, beyond occasional water trucking and food distribution. Instead, his ministry is relying on charitable donations from the Somali diaspora and local business owners, as well donation boxes in schools and mosques, while it waits for international donors to release funds. “Children are dying from malnourishment and the situation is getting worse every day,” said Mr Ahmed. “The government does not have enough resources and since the election delay, donors and the international community are hesitant to act.” Many of the people living in the ministry’s jurisdiction are cut off, living in areas controlled by al-Shabaab. Officials have no plans to reach them. In some places the Islamist group has been mounting its own relief operations, distributing food and water. They operate checkpoints just six miles from the displacement camp in Luglow. At Kismayo’s main health centre, more than 50 children are being treated for malnourishment. One of those children is 10- year-old Maido, who lies motionless under the web of a mosquito net, and is suffering from diarrhoea and frequent vomiting. She has been unable to eat solid food for days. Her mother, Qarto Aden Abdi, explained that they left their home district under al-Shabaab control after the drought killed their animals. They used to be a prosperous family, owning 300 head of cattle. But now only 20 remain, all of them starved and ridden by disease, making them worthless. “We have no health services there because the government cannot access the area,” said Qarto. “Even the rivers have dried up, and the animals grew weak because they had no pasture or water to drink.”
Hundreds of thousands of animals have been killed by the drought in Somalia, destroying livelihoods (Fred Harter) Abshir Adan Mohammed, a doctor at the hospital, said 70 per cent of the children admitted to the clinic come back at least once after being discharged because of deteriorating conditions and a lack of health services in the displacement camps. Ubah’s mother brought her to a clinic in the town before the child died. “It annoys me”, said Mr Mohammed. “It is very painful. Some of my patients, when I discharge them, they cannot afford to pay for transportation to come back, or there are no health facilities where they are, and they die from a lack of treatment.” In the area surrounding Kismayo town, at least 15 children died of starvation in the first week of March, according to local officials. But things could still get worse. There is a worry that rain may not fall for a fourth consecutive season in April. Meanwhile, the attention of donors already reluctant to fund projects in Somalia is now focused on the war in Ukraine, which has led to vital shipments of grain from Ukraine to Somalia being delayed or suspended.
Mothers wait for high-nutrition food to eat (AFP via Getty) Some humanitarians fear the situation could spiral into one resembling the 2011-12 famine, which was by some distance the worst hunger crisis of the 21st century so far. An estimated 260,000 people died of starvation in Somalia during the famine. Half were less than five years old. The main causes of the famine were severe drought exacerbated by political fighting, donors being slow to fund the response and the presence of al-Shabaab in several regions. The same factors are present in Somalia today. Ahmed from Save the Children said funding needs to be urgently scaled up to avert a disaster on a similar scale. “It all depends on how fast the response happens, and on whether we can maintain life-saving humanitarian activities,” he said. “It is not too late; there is still time to act.” Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 World Six killed as car crashes into carnival crowd in Belgium Police and witnesses stand outside a sports hall that was turned into an emergency centre (AFP) ZAINA ALIBHAI Six people were killed and 10 others seriously injured yesterday when a car crashed into carnival performers in a small town in southern Belgium. A crowd of around 150 were gathered at dawn for an annual parade in Strepy-Bracquegnies, some 30 miles south of Brussels.
The incident is not being treated as terror-related, prosecutor Damien Verheyen said, as he also denied reports that the crash involved a car being chased by police. “A speeding car drove into the crowd. The driver then continued on his way,” said Jacques Gobert, mayor of the neighbouring town of La Louviere After crashing into the crowd, the motorist attempted to drive off but was intercepted by police. The two people inside the car, locals in their 30s, were detained. Police near the crash scene in Strepy-Bracquegnies (AFP) Reporter Fabrice Collignon, who witnessed the incident, said: “We were in a long straight line and there was more or less 150 people. We heard a huge noise coming from behind the company and the car literally drove into the group of people. It’s a scene I never thought I’d see in my life. Everyone was on the ground. People were screaming. There was music and smiles and, three seconds later, it was screaming. It was horrible.” Interior minister Annelies Verlinden said the situation was being closely monitored. “Deepest condolences to the families and friends of those killed and injured in the incident this morning,” she wrote on Twitter. “What was supposed to be a great party turned into a tragedy.” King Philippe and prime minister Alexander De Croo were expected to visit the scene yesterday afternoon. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk.
Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 World/ Politics Explained What can we expect from Biden’s trip to Europe? Diplomatic moves: the president will attend a Nato meeting in Brussels on Thursday (AP) CHRIS STEVENSON When Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky addressed the US Congress on Wednesday he called on Joe Biden do all he can for Kyiv and Ukraine. “Today, it is not enough to be the leader of the nation,” Zelensky said. “Today it takes to be the leader of the world. Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace.”
The pressure will grow on Biden this week as he heads to Europe to take part in a Nato summit in Brussels on Thursday, as well as a meeting of the European Council - although he won’t be the only western leader in that regard. So what will happen? A show of western unity is a given, and the easiest thing to achieve. Meanwhile, officials will already be discussing the possible announcements that could be made at the Nato summit. However, any chance of a no-fly zone or Nato-led troops on the ground in Ukraine appears remote, thanks to the White House and a number of other nations wary that such an intervention could cause an escalation to world war. More defensive weaponry could be sent to Ukraine, and it is likely there will be some kind of announcement around increased sanctions on the Russian banking sector or on more oligarchs. Biden could also agree to scale up US troop deployments to Nato members that make up the eastern edge of the alliance - with a number of nations pushing for the US to reaffirm its commitment to collective defence in a meaningful way at the summit. The White House will want to offer allies something, but has left the form this will take open-ended for now. In a letter sent to Biden on Friday, seen by Politico, members of both the Democrats and Republicans who form the Senate Nato Observer Group have called on the president to commend those nations who have committed to increasing defence spending in the wake of the Ukraine crisis, and asked that Nato consider “all options” in helping Ukraine, and also called for the alliance to “bolster” its eastern flank. Will these measures stop the bloodshed? However unlikely, it is that question that Biden and the rest of Nato will have to find an answer to at some point. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л

MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 World/ Profile The Nato chief seeking to prevent a third world war Diplomacy runs in the veins of Jens Stoltenberg’s family, but there is much more to him than that, writes Chris Stevenson Nato’s secretary general will need all of his nous to deal with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (PA) “We have to see that Russia changes its behaviour and its actions and returns to compliance with international law and its obligations.” Those are the words of Jens Stoltenberg, the secretary-general of Nato - but not about Russia’s current invasion of Ukraine.
Instead, this is one of Stoltenberg’s first speeches after taking over the Nato near the end of 2014, and he is talking about Vladimir Putin’s annexation of Crimea earlier that year. The political strategies used by Moscow have actually studded the life of Stoltenberg, the first-ever Nato chief appointed from a country that shares a border with Russia. Although the language he has used in recent weeks has certainly been stronger, the thread of there being value in international cooperation has also been a constant of Stoltenberg’s world view. He said earlier this week: “President Putin must stop this war. Immediately. Withdraw his forces - now. And engage in diplomacy in good faith.” Stoltenberg, 63, has gained a reputation in diplomatic circles for his willingness to listen and openness to ideas - and this goes back to his upbringing. Politics and public service runs in the family - in fact, a Stoltenberg being head of Nato would seem quite natural, but most would have probably said it would have been lens’s father, Thorvald, a Norwegian diplomat and former defence and foreign minister who was tipped for the post back in the 1990s. So far so by the numbers for a person of Jens’s position - and the CV reads in a similar fashion. An early career that included a degree in economics at Oslo University, a stint as leader of the Norwegian Labour Youth - affiliated with the country’s Labour Party, which Stoltenberg joined relatively early - a job at Statistics Norway (after a dalliance with journalism) and some teaching at Oslo University. But if you look closer at Stoltenberg’s family life, it is clear there is plenty there that helped shape a man strong in his ideals. Alongside the movements of his father - the family spent some time in Belgrade when lens was young - his mother was a geneticist and civil servant who went into government too. Speaking about her on BBC Radio 4’s Desert Island Discs a couple of years ago, Jens said: “My mother was a very strong feminist... She was one of the first to formulate what we call modern family policy in Norway.”
Born in 1959, Jens was the second of three children, either side of two sisters. Jen’s younger sister, Nini, become a TV personality and was also known for being a drug addict. She died in 2014, a few months before Jens took up his role at Nato. Speaking about Nini’s death later, Stoltenberg said: “It is something I will never be able to explain... why in a family of three children - my little sister growing up in the same room that I did - she becomes a drug addict and passes away far too early.” The pair married in 1987, and now have two grown- up children, but Ingrid was wary of the effect on their family if both were in international diplomacy/politics Stoltenberg’s older sister, Camilla - the current director-general of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health - was a big influence in his youth. She took him to anti-Vietnam war demonstrations where anti-Nato songs were sung. Speaking to the BBC Camilla said that her brother was a “very sweet boy - he was kind and curious”. In his own words Stoltenberg said that he “struggled to read ... struggled to write” in his youth. Camilla remembers him conquering that around the age of 10 and that the first book she recalls him reading completely was about the siege of Leningrad. With their parents active in the Labour movement, politicians and leaders would be invited around the Stoltenberg’s breakfast table - not least Nelson Mandela. (In his appearance on Desert Island Discs Stoltenberg would make “Free Nelson Mandela” by
The Special AKA one of his choices - as well as “So Long Marianne” by Leonard Cohen, “Hungry Heart” by American rocker Bruce Springsteen, and “No Harm” by Norwegian electronic music duo Smerz, an act that includes his daughter.) “They were interested in all kinds of people - African freedom fighters and Russian - I don’t know - spies,” Camilla later told the BBC of her and Jens’s parents. Oddly, Stoltenberg was actually given a code name of “Steklov” by the KGB after he had contact with a Russian diplomat in Oslo at the end of the 1980s. Stoltenberg would eventually enter the Norwegian parliament as an MP in the early 1990s, not that his wife Ingrid Schulerud - a diplomat herself who is the current Norwegian ambassador to Belgium - was best pleased. The pair married in 1987, and now have two grown-up children, but Ingrid was wary of the effect on their family if both were in international diplomacy/politics. By 2000, Stoltenberg was in the upper echelons of his party and was offered the chance to form a government from opposition when the then prime minister Kjell Magne Bondevik stepped down. However, even Stoltenberg admits that he tried to move too quickly in his first stint as prime minister, particularly over reforms to the welfare state. The Labour Party paid for it at the ballot box in 2001, with the party gaining just 24 per cent in national elections - its worst results since the first quarter of the 20th century. As a result, Bondevik replaced Stoltenberg in office.
During the volatile previous US administration, Stoltenberg was labelled by some as the ‘Trump whisperer’ (Reuters) In 2005, Stoltenberg led a centre-left coalition of the Labour Party, Socialist Left Party, and Centre Party to government - albeit narrowly, repeating the trick in 2009. His time in office included increasing the defence spending and reforming the Norwegian armed forces - something Stoltenberg’s Nato biographies are at pains to point out. Norway also provided troops for the Nato military mission in Afghanistan and aircraft to patrol a Nato-led no-fly zone over Libya. In another example of his stance towards dealing with Moscow, in 2010, Stoltenberg and Russia’s then president Dmitry Medvedev announced the end of a bitter dispute over the maritime borders of the two nations in the Barents Sea, that had been festering for 40 years. “This is a historic day,” Stoltenberg said at the time. “We have reached a breakthrough in the most important outstanding issue between Norway and the Russian Federation.” At a Nato summit in Lisbon that year Stoltenberg called for cooperation with Moscow, saying, “We will make a fresh start in our relations with Russia, with the aim of building a strategic partnership.” Stoltenberg’s biggest test in his homeland came a year later on 22 July 2011 with a terrible twin attack - a bombing in the government district of Oslo and a gun attack at a youth camp being held by the country’s Labour Party on the island of Utoya.
Eight were killed in the bombing and 69 in the gun attack, most of them teenagers. Anders Breivik was convicted of the attacks. Stoltenberg would later describe how Utoya - which he said had been his “childhood paradise” - had been “transformed into hell”. Stoltenberg was at his official residence at the time of the bombing - he was due to be in his office in the government district but decided to stay at home to write a speech to be given on Utoya the next day as he could “concentrate better”. The pain that Stoltenberg felt appeared clear when he meet with relatives of those killed the next day. “My job was to comfort people, to support them. I only first started crying later,” he told Der Spiegel. “I was reading the headline of the country’s biggest daily newspaper, which read: ‘Today, We Are All Members of the Young Socialists’. That’s when I suddenly had to start crying. That gave me an idea of how unexpectedly people behave in an extreme situation.” I think if you had asked 30 or 40 years ago when we met whether he would become secretary-general of Nato, I think I would absolutely told you that is not possible... life is unpredictable The prime minister made a deep impression, both with his own people and globally, with his vow that Norway’s response to the bloodbath would be “more democracy, more openness and more humanity, but never naivety”. It was a message that Stoltenberg would repeat many times over the years.
In 2013, Stoltenberg’s red-green coalition was defeated in national elections by a centre-right coalition (although the Labour Party won the most seats of any individual party). That is despite some election gimmicks from Stoltenberg including videos of him becoming a taxi driver and discussing the state of the country with his fares. Stoltenberg became parliamentarian leader for the Labour Party and was later appointed a special envoy on climate change by the United Nations - another policy area that was close to his heart. Then came the Nato job, which came as a surprise to many, including Stoltenberg’s wife, Ingrid. “I think if you had asked 30 or 40 years ago when we met whether he would become secretary-general of Nato, I think I would absolutely told you that is not possible ... life is unpredictable,” she said. He was Angela Merkel’s pick for the job and gained a reputation as a safe pair of hands. During the volatile US presidency of Donald Trump, when Nato funding was a constant issue, he was labelled by some as the “Trump whisperer”. Stoltenberg will need all of that nous to deal with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, having to walk a fine line that ensues this conflict does not become a full-blown world war. Stoltenberg has ruled out using troops in Ukraine, but will deploy extra forces to the borders of Nato nations. “Nato should not deploy forces on the ground or in the air space over Ukraine because we have a responsibility to ensure that this conflict, this war, doesn’t escalate beyond Ukraine,” he said on Wednesday. It has already been announced that Stoltenberg will become Norway’s next central bank governor when his tenure as Nato secretary-general ends later this year, but he will want to do all he can to help resolve the situation before then, starting with an extraordinary meeting of Nato members in Brussels this week. As his wife Ingrid told the BBC, what has happened throughout Stoltenberg’s life has given him “a lot of confidence in the fact that you can make a difference - you can change the world”. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk.
Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 World Pixar restores same-sex kiss after ‘don’t say gay’ backlash ‘Lightyear’ tells the origin story of the popular ‘Toy Story’ character (Pixar Animation Studios) INGA PARKEL Pixar has reportedly restored a same-sex kiss shared between two characters in the forthcoming Lightyear, after staff released an open letter criticising Disney’s response to Florida’s “don’t say gay” bill. The new animated him features Chris Evans as the
voice of Buzz Lightyear and seeks to tell the origin story of the beloved Toy Story character and his journey to infinity and beyond. In an exclusive report by Variety, a source close to the production confirmed that a kiss between prominent female character Hawthorne - voiced by Uzo Aduba - and her female partner was reinstated last week. While the nature of the characters’ relationship had not been questioned, their kiss had reportedly been cut. The news follows the release of an open letter on 9 March by Pixar staff and LGBT+ allies criticising Disney for having same- sex representation in its films “shaved down to crumbs”. In the letter, staff further called on Disney to “immediately withdraw all financial support from the legislators behind the ‘don’t say gay’ bill”, which seeks to ban discussion of sexual orientation or gender identity in early-grade education. Only a handful of LGBT+ characters have been incorporated in Pixar’s feature films. Notably, in 2020 him Onward, the main character Specter makes a reference to her girlfriend. The same year, the studio released short him Out, about a gay man’s struggle to come out to his parents. In response to the Pixar staff letter, Out director Steven Hunt told Variety: “I stand by my colleagues. I’m really proud of those folks for speaking up.” He added: “We can’t assume that these laws that they’re trying to put in place aren’t hurtful and bigoted and, frankly, evil. We are not going away. We’re not going back in the closet.” Lightyear is scheduled to be released in cinemas on 17 June. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 World World news in brief Police at the scene of the shooting in the early hours of yesterday in Austin (KXAN/YouTube) Arrest after four injured in shooting near Texas festival venue A gunman left four people injured after opening fire at the South by Southwest (SXSW) festival in Austin, Texas in the early hours of yesterday. The shooting took place at around 2.50am near the Alamo Ritz theatre, one of the 10 venues for this year’s festival. The incident occurred in a busy downtown area packed with bars and restaurants. The four people injured were taken to a nearby hospital by emergency responders. Their injuries were
not thought to be life threatening. Police secured the area and warned members of the public to avoid the scene while the suspect was on the run. The suspect, who was believed to be alone, was arrested around two hours after the shooting. SXSW, a popular event which attracts tens of thousands of people, had made its return to Austin this year after a two-year absence due to the Covid pandemic. The festival combines arts and entertainment with film, talks and music from both up-and-coming artists and well- known acts. It was first established in Austin in 1987. Austin’s police department had promised to ensure higher levels of security after multiple shootings occurred during its final weekend three years ago. Five people were taken to hospital after shootings in 2019. Rapper Kanye West ‘removed from Grammy Awards line-up’ Kanye West has reportedly been barred from performing at the Grammy Awards due to his “concerning online behaviour”. The rapper - who is up for five awards this year - had not been confirmed as a performer at the forthcoming ceremony, which will take place on 4 April. A representative of West confirmed reports from The Blast that he was axed from the awards show, according to Variety. The report in The Blast posted on Friday night claimed that West’s team had received a phone call informing them that he had “unfortunately” been removed from the line-up of performers. West’s representative sent Variety a link to the story, adding only: “This is confirmed.” They did not respond to requests for further information. The report claimed that the decision was made in part due to West’s recent outburst against Trevor Noah, who will be hosting next month’s ceremony. Noah is also the writing partner of Kim Kardashian’s boyfriend Pete Davidson. West used a racial slur against Noah in an Instagram post after the Daily Show host said that the situation between the rapper, his ex-wife and Davidson was “terrifying to watch”. The musician had his account suspended, with Instagram’s parent company Meta confirming
to The Independent that it had deleted content from West’s account and temporarily restricted the account from posting, commenting and sending direct messages. The Independent has contacted representatives of the Grammys and West for comment. Man wielding an axe is restrained by worshippers at mosque Worshippers at a mosque in Canada tackled an assailant who attacked them with bear spray and an axe, police say. The man walked into the Dar Al-Tawheed Islamic Centre in Mississauga, Ontario, and “discharged bear spray towards people in the mosque while brandishing a hatchet" just before 7am on Saturday, police say. Some of the worshippers suffered minor injuries from the bear spray, according to regional police, but were otherwise unharmed. The mosque’s imam, Ibrahim Hindy, tweeted that the individual came wielding an axe and “numerous other sharp-edged weapons”, as well as the spray. “Before he could inflict harm on any worshippers, several congregants bravely were able to stop him in his tracks,” the centre said in a statement. “People are obviously quite shaken up and are recovering. For the most part, folks are still processing what’s happened and are trying to kind of see how they can ensure that their communities remain secure,” Nadia Hasan of the National Council of Canadian Muslims told the Associated Press on behalf of the mosque. Police have charged a suspect - identified as 24-year- old Mohammad Moiz Omar - with administering a noxious substance with intent to endanger life or cause bodily harm, possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, assault with a weapon, uttering threats, carrying a concealed weapon, and mischief to religious property. They said the incident was hate- motivated. President-elect to leave South Korea’s ‘unlucky’ Blue House
South Korea’s president-elect Yoon Suk-yeol has announced his decision to abandon the current presidential office of the Blue House and set up his new workplace in central Seoul, in a move that has divided the Korean public. Mr Yoon, dubbed the “South Korean Donald Trump” before his election earlier this month, starts his five-year term on to May, and had earlier said as part of his campaign pledges that he would be relocating the presidential office. The Blue House - Cheong Wa Dae - is on a secluded compound in the foothills of a mountain north of Gwanghwamun. The conservative former top prosecutor said its location and design was a symbol of “imperial” presidency that cut the nation’s leader off from the public. But the opposition Democratic Party has accused Mr Yoon of making the move - which has been budgeted to cost the public purse around 50bn won (=£31.3m) - after being influenced by masters of feng shui. Believers have linked the “inauspicious” nature of the Blue House to the fact that four out of six presidents in the past 25 years have either ended up in jail or taken their own lives after leaving office. Mr Yoon argued in his televised press conference announcing the move yesterday that it was motivated by practical concerns such as ease of working with his administration. “I’ve made this decision for the future of the country,” he said. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
INDEPENDENT PREMIUM I EVENT Exploring the pressures of fertility and the notion of the “ticking biological clock’*, with lifestyle editor Harriet Hall Wednesday 23 March, 6.30pm - 7.30pm To book your place today: 1» Log in to independentco.uk 2. Click on the red ‘My Account* icon in the top right-hand corner of the homepage З* Click on the ‘My Independent Premium’ tab to view the event 4. Click the ‘Book tickets* button to reserve your place
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Voices Aids activists have become "universal warriors of good" 100% Life’s response to the war has been a totemic example of crisis management in the most difficult of circumstances (100% Life) BORZOU DARAGAHI Several weeks before Russia invaded Ukraine, Dima Sherembei began holding a series of meetings and drawing up plans just in case war
came to his country. From his office in Kyiv, Sherembei oversees a sprawling charity that provides essential healthcare services to tens of thousands of Ukrainians with HIV across the country. The group held training sessions about what to do if men with guns swarmed Ukrainian cities, patients or staff were forcibly displaced or enemy invaders occupied their neighbourhoods. They planned out how to deliver medicines to the most vulnerable, in case the worst-case scenario came to pass. On 24 February, the worst did come to pass. Russia invaded, and the weeks of preparation gave a head start to Sherembei’s organisation, 100% Life, or the All-Ukrainian Network of People Living with HIV. The group’s response to the war has been a totemic example of crisis management in the most difficult of circumstances. It also shows the important role of Ukraine’s colourful array of civil society groups, which have blossomed since the 2013-14 Maidan uprising against a pro-Kremlin leadership. Those who fought to advance Ukrainian democracy have now become warriors in the effort to protect their countrymen sheltering in their homes and bunkers at a time of war. Their work merits attention, acclaim and support. “Our daily routines have given way to emergency hospital runs, ferrying much-needed medicine and supplies to support the wounded,” Oleksander Sushko, head of the International Renaissance Foundation, a democracy and human rights advocacy group in Ukraine, wrote in an essay. “Some assist in the delivery of materials to Ukraine’s armed forces, and help our neighbours build fortifications to protect our cities,” he continued. “Others work with local business associations to help build supply chains. An army of volunteers help the elderly, the disabled, women, and children with the many challenges of relocation, from funding the gas to move them to providing the food they need to survive.” Sherembei’s work is particularly sensitive and crucial. People with HIV typically need regular and sometimes complex
treatments at clinics under the supervision of physicians and nurses. Missing just one dose might trigger drug-resistant strains of the virus, leading to grave illness or death. More than 240,000 Ukrainians rely on 100% Life’s services to keep them from getting sick or dying. An aid worker in Ukraine prepares crucial medicine to distribute to patients in Mykolaiv (100% Life) As the airstrikes and ground invasion commenced, 100% Life’s network of 3,000 employees, scattered across 25 branch offices nationwide, had marching orders on what to do in case violence disrupted their essential work. They had stored vital patient data on cloud servers accessible across Ukraine or even abroad. They had stocked up on key antiretroviral medicines and dispersed them in veritable safehouses in case supply lines were severed. And once the conflict began, they relocated important infrastructure and supplies to the country’s western frontier, encouraging the most vulnerable patients to relocate away from front lines in eastern and southern Ukraine. “The idea was to minimise the harm that could be caused by any emotional response,” Sherembei says in an interview conducted over Zoom. “No matter how fearful or anxious they are about the situation, they still have instructions.” The group, which was once blessed by Sir Elton John and receives support from the European Union, USAid, the World
Health Organisation, Bill Gates’s Global Fund and private donations, created what it calls “chains of life”: networks of communication and distribution to allow patients to continue to receive treatments regardless of circumstances. Sometimes that has meant packing equipment and drugs into vehicles and taking them to the homes of patients who would otherwise have to walk hours to reach a clinic. Sometimes that has meant giving patients lifts to makeshift clinics. And sometimes it has amounted to helping people relocate altogether from dangerous areas into safer parts of the country. In Kyiv, the group formed in 2001 operates 10 accredited vehicles that allow its social workers and healthcare workers to move relatively freely around the city, despite martial law severely restricting the movement of people. The group serves 12,000 people in the capital. “Kyiv is a big metropolis that is closed for cars and transportation; everything is stopped,” says Sherembei. “But we continue to provide services no matter how difficult.” All of our workers become aid workers, regardless of whether they are drivers, cooks, or clinical staff. They can all provide a bed for people to sleep at night Sheremebi is a stocky, animated father-of-two in his mid-forties whom I met in Kyiv during calmer days for a feature about healthcare reform in eastern Europe. Nowadays he has redirected his considerable energies toward helping his countrymen at a time of war, sometimes going for days without sleep. He describes one patient infected with HIV, who would have had to walk several hours to reach her clinic. They relocated her
closer to another facility, and also set up a system to deliver some medicines to her home. Other vital services include collecting, packaging and delivering meals to patients too weak or frightened to venture out on their own, as well as checking in with patients at hospitals. They have reached out internationally for support, appealing for cash donations, as well as blood transfusion equipment, medical kits, blankets, mattresses, generators, tents, and fuel. Since the conflict began the group has also helped others in need, including many outside of its network, providing food and shelter, anything they can, really, to any Ukrainian in need. Hundreds of Ukrainians have come to them seeking help or services, and helping disperse the lingering stigma on those infected with HIV. “The war erased the boundary between those we normally help and those that need help on the spot,” says Sherembei. “All of our workers become aid workers, regardless of whether they are drivers, cooks, or clinical staff. They can all provide a bed for people to sleep at night. They all become universal warriors of good.” Sherembei says his organisation, which he co-founded after he himself tested positive for HIV two decades ago, has contingency plans in case Russian invaders enter the city and set up a quisling government, which appears to have been one of President Vladimir Putin’s goals. “Our patients are not soldiers,” he says. “It means for them it’s not about fighting; it’s about applying maximum effort to protect their own lives and to evacuate the occupied zone without provoking or angering the occupiers, without getting into arguments with them.” Still, he vows that he will do everything in his power to make sure that day will not come. “Myself, I will fight,” he says. “I will defend Ukraine so that the enemy does not enter Kyiv, so that Ukraine prevails.”
Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Voices Traditional conservatism is subverted by Ukraine crisis The prime minister acts like your pal who gets that ‘you’re’ not one of the scroungers (Getty) PHIL MCDUFF Recent weeks have seen an upsurge in sympathy for the plight of displaced Ukrainians in the wake of Putin’s shock invasion of the country. The Home Office is suddenly under fire for being slow to offer
aid to those in need, even from the right-wing opinion formers who until a few weeks ago would incessantly demand the exact opposite. There are several plausible explanations for why Ukrainians have received such a markedly different response to, say, Iraqis or Libyans over the years. For a start, as has been demonstrated by various unguarded remarks by certain sections of the media, Ukrainians seem to have become racialised as white, “blue- eyed” Europeans, in contrast both to the dark-skinned, Muslim populations of the Middle East, or indeed to the populations of Romania or Poland, who have been subjected to demonisation and stereotyping in the British press under the generic banner of “Eastern European”. Secondly, many of the conflicts that have triggered previous waves of refugees are the result of our own foreign policy, or those of our allies. We cannot afford to be too concerned with what they are fleeing from, lest we implicate ourselves. In contrast, Putin’s actions in Ukraine have propelled Russia back up to its Cold War position as our favourite official enemy nation. There is no conflict between condemning Russia as the instigator of a brutal invasion and drawing attention to the predicament of the Ukrainians fleeing the war zone. Whatever the reason, Ukrainian refugees seem to be seen as more “genuine” - both in sectors of the press and by the public - unlike “bogus asylum seekers” taking advantage of us, and we are therefore more inclined to accept them. Whatever the cause of the sharp change in sentiment, it has run afoul of a major issue. The UK has spent several decades making the process of migrating here more difficult, time-consuming and costly. From the opening of migrant detention centres under the New Labour government in the early 2000s to the Nationality and Borders Bill currently before parliament, the trend has been towards tightening, restricting and preventing immigration, with concessions towards ensuring the safe and humane treatment of refugees being little more than lip service in practice.
As a result, Ukrainians trying to come to the UK have faced a system described as “humiliating”. The UK’s insistence on requiring visas, in contrast to other European countries, has introduced many Ukrainians to a system which is both byzantine and Kafkaesque by design, its very complexity and inaccessibility a part of the system of deterrence. Responding to the change in public sentiment, the government launched a new “Homes for Ukraine” scheme. Under this, people in the UK can offer to sponsor visas and provide rooms or homes for Ukrainians fleeing the conflict. The UK has introduced many Ukrainians to a system which is both byzantine and Kafkaesque by design But as Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, has said, the government is still insisting on visas. “The government is relying on what is effectively a managed migration route to respond to a humanitarian crisis,” he writes. “This inevitably means paperwork and bureaucracy are being put before people’s urgent needs.” Even in the face of overwhelming public support for accepting Ukrainian refugees, the government finds itself incapable of simply doing the right thing. Daniel Trilling, author of Lights in the Distance: Exile and Refuge at the borders of Europe, said: “It looks like the government wants to pick and choose which groups of refugees it offers help to.” As Trilling points out, “this threatens to undermine a key principle of the international system for refugee protection, which is that everyone has the right to seek asylum regardless of where they’re from. If every country behaved like the UK, that international system would quickly disintegrate.”
But is such a cherry-picking approach to humanitarianism even possible? There are deeper issues being revealed here. The institutions through which state power is expressed have an inertia to them. They are lumbering behemoths - as you would expect from organisations tasked with the management of millions of people. The ideological underpinnings of the UK’s asylum system are deeply conservative. Like the benefits system, it is designed with the assumption that everyone applying should be first assumed to be a fraudster or scrounger, and that they must prove that they are not. However, there is a caveat to this: we don’t mean me or my friends or other people that we like. The nature of Johnsonism, in particular, has brought this undercurrent to the surface. The exceptions to the rule were definitely going to include you and yours, because the prime minister acts like your pal who gets that you ’re not one of the scroungers. At last, the British state would be making sure the right kind of people were getting special treatment and those “others” would be suffering at its hand. We are seeing in real time that this myth cannot hold up. If you design a border system to exclude as many people as possible, to punish before it helps, then that is exactly what it will do, even if you try to carve exclusions into it. Large, lumbering beasts of bureaucracy will not read the mind of Dave in Essex and ask if he really meant these refugees when he voted for a party which promised to tighten the system. It will simply respond to the rules and practices that were put in place because millions of people voted for them. There is a hard lesson to be learned here: to have a system capable of helping the most vulnerable, it must help everyone. If we do not err on the side of too much compassion, we will instead err on the side of cruelty. There is no point, in 2022, asking why the Home Office is behaving this way towards Ukrainians who clearly deserve better, when it is simply doing exactly what we have asked it to do.
Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Voices The things we can all do to survive the inflationary surge Going up: chancellor Ricki Sunak delivers his spring statement this week (BBC/AFP/Getty) HAMISH MCRAE Inflation is sweeping across the world and everyone is caught up by it. This Wednesday the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, will have used his spring statement to revise his tax plans in last October’s Budget.
He will probably cut taxes on energy and fuel, perhaps delay the increase in National Insurance contributions, and make some adjustment to the freeze in tax allowances in recognition that inflation is higher than expected. But what about us? What governments do about taxes is not within our control, but what we do with our own finances is. The Bank of England expects inflation to reach 8 per cent this summer. That is on the Consumer Price Index. I would expect the older measure, the Retail Price Index, to go above 10 per cent, as it is already 7.8 per cent. You have to go back to 1990 for the RPI to be in double digits, so for most people in the workforce this will be a new experience. How should we cope? This first thing to say is that not all prices will go up by 10 per cent. That is just an average. Some will go up by more, notably energy, and some by less. So one task is to focus on the goods and services that have really shot up and figure out how to spend less on them, while worrying less on the things that have remained more stable. We change our spending habits, insofar as we can, to cut our personal inflation rate. However, there is a huge social problem in that people on lower incomes are likely to face higher inflation than those who are better off, because they spend a higher proportion of their income on food and heating. But we all have to try. The second thing is that companies at every level are very aware of the squeeze. Some will take advantage of inflation, using it as an excuse to up their charges. For example, mobile phone companies are putting out notices that they will link an increase to the RPI rather than the CPI. But others, notably supermarkets, are responding by stressing value lines of produce. We are not used to worrying so much about food prices, because they account for only 11 per cent of a typical family budget. But it they really ramp up, as I fear they will, we should all think about changes to what we buy and
where we buy it. Last year, Aldi was ranked by Which? as the cheapest supermarket chain in the UK. What is happening to inflation should be a wake-up call for everyone to do a general sort-out of their finances Third, it is the small regular payments that add up. The experience of working from home, for that proportion of the workforce that is able to do so, will have taught people about the incidental costs of commuting and working from an office. It should also have taught us how to save on those costs, though I am intrigued to see how Pret a Manger coffee and sandwich sales have pretty much recovered to pre-pandemic levels, in London at least. Bloomberg does a Pret Index, which gives an indication as to how much office life has returned to normal. Four, think about savings. What has happened has been a catastrophe for anyone with much money in a bank account, but given the huge uncertainties, it is hard to advise people to race out and invest in the stock market, or crypto-currencies, or indeed anything. This is not the place for personal finance advice, but what is worth saying is that what is happening to inflation should be a wake-up call for everyone to do a general sort-out of their finances. Are we saving enough? Are we saving in a tax-efficient way? Are we paying excessive interest on loans? And so on. Finally, we need to be aware of two things about inflation. First, while inflation will come back down, it may well settle at a higher base than it has been over the past 15 or so years. It may settle at 2 per cent or thereabouts, and that is the central banks’ target. But I think it more likely that we will see it at 3 per cent or more for several years. We must stay cautious.
The other is that even low levels of inflation eat away at the real value of money over time. This century, inflation in the UK has averaged 2.8 per cent a year. That does not sound too bad, but ask how much money would you need now to buy goods that cost £100 in 2000? The Bank of England has a nifty calculator that will tell you. It would be <£179.10, and that was in December. Come the end of this year it will be the thick end of £200. It is an insidious thing, inflation. If this dreadful experience we are having right now teaches us to be more aware of the damage it does, maybe that will be a small silver lining to a dark and dangerous cloud. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Voices HTzp we should embrace the influence TV has on our lives Career starter: ‘University Challenge’ inspired me to become a science journalist (BBC/Lifted Entertainment/ITV Studios) HAFSA KHALIL “How did you go from neuroscience to journalism?” If I got a pound for every time someone asked me this, I would be a millionaire. The story starts with why I studied neuroscience, and it comes down to a TV show I watched during my А-levels. Perception starred Eric McCormack (Will of Will & Grace fame) as the
eccentric Dr Daniel Pierce, a schizophrenic university professor who uses his unique skills to help the FBI solve their more curious criminal cases. As soon as I saw it, I was hooked. I already wanted to become a doctor so being a neurologist suited me; I was obsessed with the brain and its unknown parts (when I think about it now, it may have been the sci-fi geek in me that found it attractive). But Perception got me thinking. I wanted to study what Dr Pierce taught - neuroscience. If I hadn’t seen Perception, I wouldn’t have gone on to study a subject I love. I wouldn’t have even known it existed. It was a case of the right TV show, right time. Neuroscience was a labour of love: I was passionate about it but didn’t have a specific career in mind. I wasn’t keen on the idea of research because of the admin work (data entry is boring and tedious) but even so, I spent my placement year as a research assistant. While I enjoyed working on groundbreaking autism research, it wasn’t for me. I’ll admit I was stuck. I had no idea what I wanted after my degree. And then it happened again. I was watching an alumni episode of University Challenge. One of the teams had two science journalists and the first thing that went through my mind was: why don’t I become a science journalist? I already loved writing (and was writing my own novel) so it just clicked for me. I never looked back. If off the back of watching ‘MasterChef’ or ‘Bake Off’ someone goes, ‘you know what? Pm going to cook food for a living’, then that is what they should do 99 We should embrace the influence of TV on our lives. When I had a mock interview with my university careers team and was asked why I was studying neuroscience, I told them about Perception.
Their response? “Don’t mention TV in your interview or they won’t take you seriously.” But why shouldn’t they take me seriously? Everything we see and hear influences us, so it makes perfect sense that TV would do the same. It’s about being in the right place, watching the right show at the right time. I studied neuroscience, did a journalism master’s and am currently working for an international news organisation. I write science articles because it’s my first love, and I write lifestyle and travel stories because it’s fun. And that is all off the back of TV shows and the influence they had on my life. If a kid watches Call the Midwife or sees Hugh Laurie in House and wants to become a midwife or doctor, why shouldn’t they? If an episode of Doctor Who inspires the next Professor Brian Cox or Stephen Hawking, they should go for it. Heck, if off the back of watching MasterChef or Bake O//someone goes, “you know what? I’m going to cook food for a living”, then that is what they should do. So how did a neuroscientist become a journalist? It’s a tale of two TV shows. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
0\е^°
Whenever it’s sunny up here in Manchester, which let’s be honest, isn’t very often, I whip out the old ones, bought in the sale in a small American mall. You know the kind. The metal has got wet too many times, so there’s that weird green rust on the frames, the arms fall in on themselves and there’s now an extra bend around the nose piece so they’re not even symmetrical on my face. I’m telling you all this in painstaking detail because for reasons unknown, I’ve decided that the new ones are for special occasions. You know how you’ve got a pair of “best” jeans that you haven’t needed to wear for two years because we’ve all lived in joggers? Yeah, like that. Only here’s the thing - I don’t really know what I’m waiting for. I’ve hit that magical age of 35, so maybe it’s some kind of mid- life crisis, just without the Aston Martin, because I can’t afford one. There are women I could have gone out with who are now engaged or happily married, and either pregnant or with young children. I’m just knocking about, trying to work out what to do with my life and seemingly waiting for some kind of divine intervention. Over the last five years, I’ve thought about mortality - both my own and relating to the people that I love - more than I probably should have. Am I a good person? Could I do better? What’ll be my legacy? What will I do without my mum? Is marrying Jennifer Aniston merely a pipe dream? All of those big existential questions have obviously been accelerated somewhat by a global pandemic and now a heinous war in Europe that I can’t really begin to comprehend. More than 2.5 million people have fled their homes in Ukraine, described by the UN as the fastest-growing refugee crisis since the Second World War, and yet here I am, writing about my sunglasses. I understand the absurdity of that. The outrageous insignificance of everything right now isn’t lost on me. In fact, more than ever, I’m realising that our time here is short. Yet, there’s also a sense of the most important things in life being lost. We stress. We work. We worry. We sweat the
small stuff. We overcomplicate. We seek instant gratification. We compare ourselves. We value the wrong things. I had a little moment of celebration, a mini fist-pump and then (not unlike him), realised the significance of that moment, was overcome with emotion and cried proper tears There’s poverty, hunger, illness, death, social injustice, and environmental annihilation. Life is brutal and horrific. It’s magical and beautiful. It’s that stark contrast and dichotomy all the time - and everything at the moment feels like it can’t possibly be happening. Soon we’re all going to wake up and realise that this was all some kind of dystopian nightmare of epic, biblical proportions. It turns out that politicians can be trusted; corruption doesn’t run deep into every crack of society; money isn’t dirty; kindness, peace and humanity are valued above money and power. I know, I know. lust like the bit about lennifer Aniston, I’m delusional. I’m also more emotional than ever before. Yes, even more than in my university emo days. I was listening to West Ham on the radio last weekend when Andriy Yarmolenko, the Ukrainian international, came off the bench to score a pearler and put the Hammers 1-0 up against Aston Villa. I had a little moment of celebration, a mini fist-pump and then (not unlike him), realised the significance of that moment, was overcome with emotion and cried proper tears. Horror and beauty - again. Biffy Clyro once sang that “Living Is a Problem Because Everything Dies”. Simon Neil sings, “I pray to God that you’re right before my eyes/ Bathed in white light, with halos in your
eyes” - and I reckon those Scottish rockers were on to something. There’s a fine line between normality and tragedy. The distinction between black and white is blurred and it all turns to grey. What’s this all about? Why do bad things happen and how can those so deeply affected carry on? They have to. Life doesn’t slow down; it just rattles on undeterred. Unmoved. Life is precious. It’s overwhelming and uncertain. It’s not assured. It’s here and then it’s not. So, when I’m fortunate enough to pack my things at the end of the month and take my first holiday for more than two and a half years, guess what’s going in the bag first? Yep. Those new sunglasses. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Voices/ Editor’s Letter On the opinion desk, news has never been more diverse Our small team always tries its best under extreme pressure - but we don’t always get things right, says Victoria Richards We’ve covered everything from the Ukraine war to Covid and rising inflation recently (Reuters) What a week. We’ve seen intensifying horror in Ukraine, with news that a theatre was destroyed despite a sign bearing the word “children” outside to warn Russian forces. We also saw that an art school in Mariupol, sheltering some 400 Ukrainians, had been bombed.
Meanwhile, the Voices team has been juggling coverage of the war and Covid with analysis of and lookaheads to Rishi Sunak’s spring statement on Wednesday. We have also been endeavouring to bring you more cutting-edge cultural commentary, in the form of weekend long-reads - such as CBeebies presenter Ben Cajee’s piece about seizing the day. As editors on the opinion desk, all we can try to do is our best - and we don’t always get it right. Nobody does. But I am proud of the work we do at Voices. We strive to do good and help the disenfranchised. And, when and where people feel we have fallen short, rest assured that we do read your thoughts and comments, and hate to hear that people are upset or hurt, or disagree with an editorial decision we have made. We all feel it. We don’t take the burden of responsibility lightly - we are often working fast and are under extreme pressure to reflect on the breaking news agenda, offer analysis and thoughtful reflection, and move the conversation forward. We are a small team: just three people working full-time to bring you the latest in-house political commentary and analysis on subjects as diverse as the war in Ukraine to inflation, while also commissioning “deep dives” into subjects like love, dating, relationships and mental health. Our aim is to encourage respectful discourse. We will always offer space for a right of reply, or to examine an opposing view people feel passionate about, and we try to take the utmost care when it is one that affects people’s lives. We may not always get it right, but we will strive to learn and be better. It is essential that we continue to amplify a range of diverse voices. We want to hear yours. Yours, Victoria Richards Voices Editor
Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Voices/ Letters Britain lags behind when it comes to resettling refugees Britain’s security services need to be vigilant, as always, but this should not prevent desperate refugees from gaining temporary respite from Vladimir Putin’s evil war on Ukraine. Again, Priti Patel misses what refugees need in this crisis. They ought to be allowed into Britain and then be vetted in the normal way. Those with family already residing here is an ideal way of tracking refugees - they probably need less administrative and financial help, and their history can be vouched for by relatives. While here, let them work to support themselves, which will contribute to the economy and community. Foreign countries wanting to attack Britain from within, as Russia has done, would easily find ways of doing so without having to use the cover of a crisis. Ms Patel and the government ought to help people in desperate need, not prolong the terror and uncertainty in their lives. As with other refugees, women and children are the worst affected and least responsible for the situation, and it is those whom we ought to be aiding as urgently as possible. The UK lags far behind other countries in settling Ukraine refugees which has further tarnished Britain’s name. Keith Poole Basingstoke
Johnson and Putin are both traitors Boris Johnson has compared the fight against the slaughter of Ukrainian women and children in their hundreds by Russian forces to people voting for the campaign of lies, deception and self-harm called Brexit. He has drawn the wrong parallel. The similarity is that, in both cases, the leaders of the UK and Russia have betrayed their own people by pursuing policies of lies, economic and social harm, immorality and long-term destruction of opportunities for young people. Boris and Putin are both traitors. Richard Whitton Hadley Wood The PM’s incompetence is an insult to Ukrainians Mr Johnson’s latest demonstration of his unsuitability for the role of prime minister is a triple insult to Ukrainians. Not only is he oblivious or ignoring their stated wish of joining the EU, but, having commented a few years ago that he made a mistake in supporting the Leave campaign, presumably he is advocating the proletariat’s right to be free to be duped by self-serving politicians. Mr Putin also seems to have felt “free” to enact his perverse landgrab, emboldened no doubt by a perceived weakening of the EU, created by the UK’s selfish and hastily conceived departure. Nigel Plevin Somerset Rees-Mogg’s ‘war on woke’ is a joke In his “war on woke” the insufferable Jacob Rees-Mogg wants to call Beijing Peking once again. I suggest he starts closer to home and gives London its original name of Londinium. After all, he likes Latin so much he had a Catholic mass conducted in Latin at his wedding. Patrick Cleary Gloucestershire
Who is right about badger culling? Does licensed badger-killing aid the eradication of bovine ТВ? The answer depends on who you ask. According to the study published last week, no, it doesn’t. And yet according to the chief vet, farmers and cattle veterinarians, it does. Who is right? In my experience, once effective controls are in place and after an initial lag, the effect of a successful disease control strategy is obvious. The incidence falls precipitately until the tail of the epidemic withers away. Epidemic curves of BSE and foot-and- mouth disease illustrate this well. Yet, despite almost 10 years of licensed badger-killing and enhanced controls on cattle, there is scant evidence of a similar turnaround in bovine ТВ incidence. In Wales, where there is no licensed badger-killing, incidence is falling quicker than in England. Infection is spreading to new areas of England necessitating badger-killing in areas that have been low-risk for decades. A cloak of secrecy surrounds the programme. This has two main drawbacks: first, access to data is severely constrained meaning independent scrutiny is almost impossible; second, local residents - unless you occupy sufficient land - are told nothing. Where and when the killing takes place is confidential despite it appearing to take place just over my hedge. We deserve better. Trust us: in the absence of independent analysis demonstrating that badger killing is effective, the cull appears to be another front in the government’s and landowners’ war on our wildlife. And while you are at it, have a little respect for the residents caught up in the killing zones - tell us what is going on and when. Alick Simmons UK government deputy chief veterinary officer, 2007-16, Somerset
Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Section 2/ The Big Read A graceful retirement? The country might forgive the Queen if she opted to put her feet up after many decades of honourable service. But it isn’t in her nature to take the easy way out, writes Sean O’Grady In 2026 Queen Elizabeth will be one of the country’s 16,000 or so centenarians (Getty/PA) The extreme longevity of Elizabeth II presents the country with the delicate question of how a monarch who is inevitably growing more frail can best deal with the duties of office, even if they are confined to the “light” sort. This applies most obviously to some constitutionally irrelevant ones, such as visits, and to
those with greater significance, if only ceremonial, such as attending the Remembrance Day service, but also to those with modest political ramifications, such as advising her prime minister. She is 95, and by far the longest-lived monarch in British history. Her father, a lifelong heavy smoker, died at the age of 56. Her great-grandfather and grandfather, also smokers, passed at 68 and 70 respectively, and Queen Victoria, who we think of as impossibly old, went to that great empire in the sky aged 81, just beating George Ill’s record. Victoria was old for her era, but would have been considered no great age these days. In her way, Elizabeth II is a symbol of the greying of Britain. If she lives as long as her mother, in 2026 she will be one of the country’s 16,000 or so centenarians, who are mostly female and were part of a baby boom that came after the end of the First World War (though some of her contemporaries will have died before their time because of Covid). She’ll be able to send herself the famous telegram. Elizabeth II has beaten the records set by George III, Queen Victoria and George VI (PA) Such extreme old age, then, raises an especially delicate question, because the Queen is, so far as can be seen, as mentally sharp as ever, though physically not as active. She is not “incapacitated” and has even managed to get through Covid,
albeit with missed engagements and little sign of her at the races or even at church. However, there are mobility issues after her mysterious “bad back” incident last year, when the palace made the cardinal error of upsetting the press by covering up her spell in hospital (even flying the royal standard at Windsor to complete the unsuccessful subterfuge). Her most recent audience with Boris Johnson was over the phone, and ambassadors to the Court of St James’s present their credentials at a table next to a video link to the Queen. It is some years, for example, since she went abroad, and most of her remaining “dominions beyond the seas” are now well out of reach. Such expeditions are now delegated to the heir to the throne, Charles, and his heir; William and Kate will be off for a tour of the Caribbean shortly. As the next Prince and Princess of Wales, they’ve just made their first St David’s Day visit to the country. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge at Abergavenny market to mark St David’s Day (PA) It must be in some doubt, for example, whether the Queen might be able to open a new session of parliament in the traditional manner. She has one major public appearance coming up, this being the memorial service for Prince Philip at Westminster Abbey, and then a slimmed-down list of functions
for her platinum jubilee, which would be tiring, to say the least, for anyone in their nineties. A grateful nation might forgive the Queen if she decided to put her feet up at long last, as her late husband did, but everyone knows it’s out of the question. Or at least, abdication is, and you suspect that any courtier or member of the family who mentioned “the A-word” would be treated to a withering glare. She isn’t going to quit, because she’s made solemn declarations not to, and she famously takes her promises seriously, unlike some others in public life. For the record, she said at her coming of age (21) on 21 April 1947: “I declare before you all that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service and the service of our great imperial family to which we all belong.” As far as the Queen is concerned, abdication is not in the nature of the British monarchy, where it has been rare and, frankly, shameful It’s dated, but it’s up there on the Buckingham Palace website, and it remains a personal pledge. Still more solemn were the coronation vows she took in 1953, at a serene religious service before God. Here is the official account of these sacred moments, in all their medieval, imperial and other-worldly glory, from the Order of Service: The Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,
Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath? And the Queen answering, I am willing. The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and The Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question as follows: Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs? ueen. I solemnly promise so to do. Archbishop. Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements? Queen. I will. Elizabeth just before her 2ist birthday in 1947 (PA) Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them? ueen. All this I promise to do. Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premisses: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great
Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the Altar bp the Arch-bishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and saping these words: The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God. Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath. So, not something to be dropped lightly. As far as the Queen is concerned, abdication is not the nature of the British monarchy, where it has been rare and, frankly, shameful, though her uncle Edward VIII’s renunciation of the throne is how she became Queen. Another option might be a ‘soft regency’, where the Prince of Wales takes on more of the Queen’s familiar duties, plus some, but not all, of the most important ones Difficult as it may be to credit now, in the 1980s, in the heyday of the popularity of Charles and Diana, there was serious talk about pensioning off the Queen and letting the glamorous Prince and Princess of Wales take over. The Queen, perhaps knowing more about their private lives than the public did, remained unpersuaded and on the throne. Just as well. Of course, the Queen doesn’t need to abdicate to allow other members of the family to take on patronages and military honorffics, and the Prince of Wales and others can bestow honours and accompany her at engagements, as has been the
case since the Duke of Edinburgh retired from public life in 2017 (aged 96, as it happens). But Prince Charles cannot legally, say, sign acts of parliament, appoint prime ministers or dissolve parliament, merely formal as these functions are. For that we would need the constitutional fix known as a regency - where all the powers and prerogatives of the monarch can be transferred to someone else. So the Queen would still be Queen, as per the coronation oath, but Prince Charles would perform all her constitutional functions as Prince Regent. Fortunately, most of the arrangements for a regency were prepared as far back as 1953, building on a template set in 1937, when the Queen’s father had become George VI and his heir presumptive, the then Princess Elizabeth, was 11. The Queen with Charles at the opening session of parliament in May 2021 (PA) A regency is thus ready to be implemented at any time, though it would be in rather different circumstances from those pertaining to the early part of the Queen’s reign. In the event of her passing, or other incapacitation, the crown couldn’t have passed to her children, because Prince Charles was five years old, and Princess Anne was three. Even in a traditional country such as Britain, it would be difficult to justify having a toddler refuse to give the royal assent to bills passed by parliament, or to sack the prime minister - at the time
Winston Churchill - because they were afraid of him. The age of infant monarchs, with or without “protectors”, had long since passed. The surprising thing about the Regency Act 1953 is that it wasn’t the next in line to the throne - the queen’s younger sister, Princess Margaret - who would become regent, but Prince Philip: a rule that would apply until the children came of age (18). Perhaps it was plain sexism, or that the courtiers perceived some flaw in the fun-loving princess’s personality, but she was locked out of the role. There were precedents. George V’s nominated regent was his wife, Queen Mary; and George II vetoed his son and heir from becoming regent because he didn’t like him. In the decades since, the procedure has been refined and adjusted, and it now stipulates that certain named individuals, presumably on medical advice, must be “satisfied by evidence, which shall include the evidence of physicians, that the sovereign is by reason of infirmity of mind or body incapable for the time being of performing the royal functions, or that they are satisfied by evidence that the sovereign is for some definite cause not available for the performance of those functions, then ... as the case may be, those functions shall be performed in the name and on behalf of the sovereign by a regent”.
The Prince Regent gave his name to an era, and left behind a fine architectural legacy, plus a personal reputation for defying his parents, meddling in politics and being unkind to his wife The individuals charged with this momentous decision are at least three of the following: the lord chancellor (effectively now the minister of justice, Dominic Raab); the speaker of the House of Commons (Sir Lindsay Hoyle); the lord chief justice of England and Wales (Lord Burnett of Maldon); and the master of the rolls (Sir Geoffrey Vos). Prince Charles would then become Prince Regent. It would be a curious business: if it were being proposed because of the weight of public opinion - a feeling that the Queen was pushing herself too hard - and the Queen resisted, then it would be a rare example of the Queen defying public opinion. On the other hand, by its nature, the Regency Act doesn’t need the sovereign’s consent because that cannot be properly given. The last time a regency was set up was during the periodic madness of George III. In that case, the then Prince of Wales was made Prince Regent without the King’s assent to the relevant act of parliament, which had to be passed hurriedly and with little legal preparation. If nothing else, it was evident that even in those days of some monarchical power, the constitution was flexible enough and democratically driven enough to have the politicians making the key decisions.
The Prince Regent gave his name to an era, and left behind a fine architectural legacy, plus a personal reputation for defying his parents, meddling in politics, being unkind to his wife, and marrying his mistress. So nothing like the present Prince of Wales, and prospective next Prince Regent. The royal family on holiday at Balmoral in 1951 (PA) Another option might be a “soft regency”, where the Prince of Wales takes on more of the Queen’s familiar duties, plus some, but not all, of the most important (and less tiring) constitutional functions, until such time as she is no longer able to fulfil the rest. It would be a practical, pragmatic and respectful answer to a conundrum that can only become more pressing as time passes. The 1937 and 1953 acts could even be amended to “lose the bar” concerning “infirmity of mind or body incapable ... the Queen could then formally grant her assent to the change. One thing that would need to change, though, in order to gain political and popular consent for a regency of any shape, is the convention that the Commons never discusses the monarch, or at least avoids doing so. You may recall a few weeks ago that Sir Keir Starmer mentioned the commonly made contrast between the conduct of the Queen at her husband’s funeral and the riotous parties in Downing Street the evening before. The speaker quickly shut the leader of
the opposition up, in line with the usual practice of not discussing the Queen’s behaviour. But if the nation is to be ruled by Prince Charles as Prince Regent, it would seem only right to have such a proposal granted fresh democratic legitimacy. The Abdication Act of 1936 was given a full Commons debate, complete with a full account by the prime minister of his dealings with the (soon-to-be-ex-) King. So the prohibition is not absolute, and it cannot be, where the constitution is affected. It ought to all go very smoothly. Provided she went along with it. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Section 2/ Ask Simon Calder Are rule-free cruise holidays finally on the cards again? Journeys that take in more than two or three countries are not plain sailing (Getty) Ql’ve not heard much about the cruise industry recently and I wondered if the abolition of masks on board and getting off a ship at a port of call without an organised tour are now possibilities? David G A Cruise continues to be the problem child of the tourism industry. The Department for Transport (DfT) says: “Although operators have taken steps to improve infection control, cruise
ships continue to experience Covid-19 outbreaks, affecting passengers and seafarers. “The confined setting on board and combination of multiple households enables Covid-19 to spread faster than it is able to elsewhere. Cruises with confirmed or suspected Covid-19 cases have previously been denied permission to dock or to disembark passengers. This can have serious implications for passengers and seafarers on board. You should check the protocols of the cruise operator to ensure you are comfortable with safety measures.” In terms of those safety measures, many cruise lines are now allowing independent excursions at ports of call, rather than signing up for expensive and confined ship-run outings. Local rules may still prevent passengers from wandering off wherever they wish. The Dominica government, for example, says: “Only passengers that have pre-sold or organised tours will be able to go beyond the health checkpoint.” I am not recommending any cruises that take in more than two or three countries: the higher the number of nations involved, the more the risk of some kind of misfortune affecting the voyage. A trip around the Greek islands, or the coast and isles of Italy, would be fine - except that in both those cases, there are inexpensive and fun alternatives, notably ferries (and, for Italian journeys on the mainland) trains. I have taken only one cruise since they were allowed from UK ports again, and the mask- wearing was slightly annoying but bearable. Email your question to s@hols.tv or tweet @simoncalder Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Section 2 BIRTHDAYS Actor and director Gary Oldman is 64 today (Getty) Nick Baines, keyboardist (Kaiser Chiefs), 44; Matthew Broderick, actor, 60; Peter Brook, theatre and film director and producer, 97; Jane Bruton, deputy editor, The Daily Telegraph, and former editor-in-chief, Grazia, 55; Guy Chadwick, singer- songwriter and guitarist (The House of Love), 66; Adrian Chiles, radio and television broadcaster, 55; Timothy Dalton, actor, 76; Jamie Delgado, coach and former tennis player, 45; Ray Dorset, singer and guitarist (Mungo Jerry), 76; leuan Evans, pundit and former rugby union player, 58; Michael Foreman, writer and
illustrator, 84; Lord Grabiner, lawyer and president, University of Law, 77; Sir John Hall, property developer and life president, Newcastle United FC, 89; Lord Heseltine, founder, Haymarket Publishing Group, and former government minister, 89; Karolina Hrdlidkovi (Karolina PliSkovA), tennis player, 30; Rochelle Humes, singer (The Saturdays) and television presenter, 33; General Sir Mike Jackson, former chief of the General Staff, British Army, 78; Carwyn Jones, professor of law, Aberystwyth University, and former first minister of Wales, 55; Jade Jones, taekwondo athlete, 29; Lothar Matthaus, former footballer, 61; Matthew Maynard, coach and former cricketer, 56; Jonathan Mills, composer and former director, Edinburgh International Festival, 59; Sarah Jane Morris, singer, 63; Amanda Nevill, former chief executive, British Film Institute, 65; Professor Anne Neville, engineer and research chair in emerging technologies, University of Leeds, 52; Gary Oldman, actor and director, 64; Professor JD Pickard, emeritus professor of neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, 76; Ronaldinho (Ronaldo de Assis Moreira), former footballer, 42; Rose Stone (Rosemary Stewart), singer and keyboardist (Sly and the Family), 77; Professor Stephen Weatherill, emeritus professor of European law, University of Oxford, 61; Mike Westbrook, jazz composer, pianist and bandleader, 86; Mark Williams, snooker player, 47; Slavoj Zizek, philosopher and international director, The Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities, University of London, 73. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Section 2/ Women Asking the right questions Laura Hampson gets up close and personal with the female anatomy in the Vagina Museum’s new east London location The world’s first institution dedicated to vulvas and labia means business (iStock) There’s one with a pierced clitoris, another with a tampon string hanging out. One’s completely hairless, another is encased in a ginger halo. Some have longer labia than others, and some labia are tucked away. I’m looking at a wall of vulvas - 56 vulvas to be exact, all photographed in colour. Each vulva was handpicked
from a pool of 500 by the Vagina Museum’s founder, Florence Schechter. It’s a striking sight, this sea of vulvas, and, as Schechter explains, it was the “top requested thing” by past visitors ahead of the Vagina Museum’s reopening this weekend. The Vagina Museum, the world’s first of its kind, initially opened in the London borough of Camden in 2019, but its origin dates back to 2017. After its lease in Camden was not renewed, it relocated to a new location: Bethnal Green, where it opened again to the public on Saturday. The vulva wall takes pride of place in the museum’s permanent exhibit, alongside felt depictions of the female anatomy and discharge-bleached underwear. A video about female genital mutilation plays in one of the cabinets. The shelf with the “virgin soap” had to be encased in glass as it was stolen at the last exhibit. The wall gets me thinking about my own vagina. I’m lucky in the sense that it’s never been a source of insecurity for me - to me, it is what it is - but not everyone with a vagina feels the same. A 2015 study found that 36 per cent of Britons between the ages of 18 to 30 said they worried their genitals weren’t “normal”. Almost three quarters (73 per cent) of those who said this were women. Of course, the reason for this is that we’ve been so conditioned by porn to think that one type of vagina is “normal” when, in fact, there is no “normal” when it comes to vulvas and labia - and this is exactly what the Vagina Museum hopes its visitors take away from it. “Gynaecological anatomy is nothing shameful, we want to get rid of that stigma,” Schechter explains. “We want people to know that there’s nothing to be ashamed of, there’s nothing to be embarrassed about. You can ask any question you want, that’s the overarching message in everything we do.”
‘We want people to know that there’s nothing to be embarrassed about,’ the founder says (Vagina Museum) Schechter was working as a science communicator making YouTube videos before she launched this unique project. It was when she realised that, while there is a penis museum in Iceland - the Icelandic Phallological Museum, which opened in 1997 - there wasn’t a vaginal equivalent. She took this knowledge to the hivemind that is Twitter and “decided there and then” she was going to open the museum herself. “I have always loved vaginas,” she says as we sit near the entrance of the museum following a show and tell of the permanent exhibit and the temporary one, Periods: A Brief History. “Being a bisexual woman, it’s a passion of mine,” she laughs. “I come from a family where it was always very open, we felt like we could ask questions and debate and question things, so that’s given me a really good outlook on life.” In its Camden location, the museum’s first temporary exhibition was Muff Busters: Vagina Myths and How to Fight Them. “We felt like before we got going we needed to smash a few things,” Schechter says. At its Bethnal Green location, minutes from the Underground station and down Sugar Loaf Walk, the Vagina Museum is set in ENTER, a collective building and creative hub. It’s an industrial setting: think concrete floors, bright lights and white walls. Entrance to the museum is free, but donations are welcome and there’s a gift shop filled with fun souvenirs.
The temporary exhibition will be live for the next six months and allows visitors to walk through the history of periods, from prehistoric cave art to the issues facing periods today, like period poverty and period shame. “We looked at the national and international conversation,” Schechter says of the decision to make periods the museum’s next temporary exhibition. “Everyone is talking about periods at the moment. But what was interesting is that people weren’t talking about the history of periods and a lot of people were wondering, ‘where did this come from? Why are we ashamed of periods?’ Because I feel like if you know where you’ve come from you’ll know where you’re going.” Period drama: the menstrual cycle was considered to be ‘divine’ before the patriarchy started (Vagina Museum) Looking over at the giant menstrual cups and tampons decorated with red sequins, Schechter explains that periods were once considered powerful “because periods are when people bleed and don’t die, that’s insane,” she laughs. “So they were like ‘oh my god, you must be a goddess. There’s no other way to explain it, you must be divine’. And then the patriarchy started. It turned this thing that was really powerful and shifted the framing slightly to make it ‘dangerous and disgusting’.” If you’re east London-based, it’s been hard to miss the Vagina Museum’s new campaign. Designed by creative agency The Or, the campaign has slogans like “be the first to come”, “mind the
wap” and “like the clit, not hard to find if you know where to look”. First visitors will also notice two empty spaces at the museum: one is set to be an education centre for school groups who visit and the other a community art gallery. The word “empowered” has become overused, but it’s hard to feel anything but as you walk around the museum. It’s immediately clear that the space is a passion project run by a collective group of charismatic women who care that we get more in tune with our vaginas. And it’s not just for women. As Schecter notes, when the museum first opened it saw women “dragging” their boyfriends to show them the clitoris exhibit. We can’t possibly imagine why. So, it seems, there’s something there for everyone. Periods: A Brief History is on at the Vagina Museum for six months beginning 19 March. Entry is free Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Section 2/ Women CRASH, BANG, WALLOP As Apple TV launches ‘WeCrashed’ about the dramatic rise and fall of the WeWork empire, Laura Hampson asks, where did everything go wrong for Adam and Rebekah Neumann? Jared Leto and Anne Hathaway, left, as WeWork’s Adam and Rebekah Neumann, right (Apple TV/Getty/Reuters) It’s the season for scammers. Well, for television viewers in any case. Following the drop of Inventing Anna and The Tinder Swindler on Netflix in February, Disney+ saw the tale of
Elizabeth Holmes and the swift crash of her biotech company Theranos relayed in The Dropout. And now we’ve got another “scam” to sink our teeth into: WeCrashed. WeCrashed, which launched on Apple TV+ on 18 March, takes a dramatised look at WeWork, the co-working giant that went from being one of the world’s most valuable start-ups to having its stock plummet in 2019. At its height, the company had locations globally and a valuation of $4bn (<£36bn). It was looking to expand into gyms and schools before it faced looming bankruptcy at the end of 2019. In WeCrashed, Jared Leto and Anne Hathaway play WeWork co- founder Adam Neumann and his wife, WeWork’s chief brand and impact officer, Rebekah (nee Paltrow, yes that Paltrow. Rebekah is the first cousin of Gwyneth). It charts the rise and fall of one of the biggest unicorn companies of the past two decades - but what happened to the tech company that had such a promising future? And what happened to its leader who was often accused of running a “cult- like” and “toxic” work environment? 2008: Green Desk is established, the Neumanns marry In 2008, Adam Neumann and architect Miguel McKelvey started Green Desk, an “eco-friendly co-working space” which was based out of Brooklyn in New York.
WeWork’s Adam and Rebekah Neumann (Getty/Time) Neumann and McKelvey sold Green Desk 2010. This was the same year that Adam and Rebekah Neumann got married, just months after they met. Later, Rebekah told Coveteur: “From the second I met Adam there was an energy between us that felt like it was larger than just the two of us.” It was Rebekah’s investment, a reported $lm (<£763,000) that helped WeWork get off the ground. Over the years she held several roles at the company, including chief brand officer and co-founder, although the latter has been debated. “I’m responsible for all of the messaging, the mission, the values, and, most importantly, staying true to the DNA and mission of what we initially set out to do at WeWork,” she told Coveteur. 2010: WeWork is founded Neumann and McKelvey began WeWork with its first location in Manhattan’s S0H0 district. WeWork billed itself as a real estate company that provided shared workspaces for start-ups, freelancers and other companies. Its spaces were revered for being modern and “Instagrammable” (even before Instagram was a thing), with sleek wooden floors, community lounges, ping pong tables and neon signs carrying slogans like “Hustle Harder” and “Make It Happen”.
2011: WeWork launches WeWork Labs The first WeWork Labs opened in SoHo in 2011. The labs functioned as a “start-up incubator” and provided a workspace for those looking to develop a start-up company but who “don’t have their business ideas fully cooked”. Still functioning today, WeWork Labs says it “fosters meaningful connections between start-ups and the educational, mentorship and financial resources needed to drive their businesses forward”. 2012: WeWork opens its first Los Angeles and San Francisco outposts and begins hosting its Summer Camp Two years after its launch, WeWork went bicoastal and opened its first office space in Los Angeles. By the end of 2012, WeWork had four offices in New York City, one in Los Angeles and one in San Francisco. This was also the first year WeWork hosted its first annual Summer Camp, which was mandatory for employees - a three- day “networking and music” event which saw WeWorkers descend on a wooded property owned by Rebekah’s family in upstate New York. Employees were also said to be expected to attend the company’s weekly Thank God It’s Monday parties, which often went to the early hours of the morning. 2013: WeWork continues its US expansion By the end of 2013, WeWork had two new offices in Washington DC and another in Seattle. This was the year the Neumanns purchased a $10.5m (£8m) Greenwich Village townhouse, which they renovated for $6.4m (£4-9m), as well as a “modest” home in the Hamptons. The Wall Street Journal reports that their real estate portfolio continued to grow over the next five years, converting four condos in New York’s Gramercy Park to a single penthouse, which they later listed for $37.5m (£28.7m); a $15m (£11.4m) estate in Bedford, a mansion in Amagansett that backed onto
one of Gwyneth Paltrow’s homes, and a $21m (.£16m) mansion in California. At 2013’s Summer Camp, Neumann said on stage: “Every one of us is here because it has meaning, because we want to do something that actually makes the world a better place. And we want to make money doing it!” Neumann became an almost shamanic figure at WeWork, which employees would later reflect on as being “cult-like”. “When you’re in a room with Adam, he can almost convince you of anything,” one former employee told Vanity Fair. A senior executive added: “So many of the people were young and had never worked in a real company. They bought all of it. I realised after I got there it was a cult.” 2014: WeWork begins its international expansion By 2014, WeWork had seen quick and exponential growth. It had 200 employees, 1.5m sq ft of space and 10,000 members. In 2014 it looked to London to open its first international office, on the Southbank. Today, there are 49 WeWork spaces located in the capital. A WeWork location in London in 2021 (Getty) 2015: WeWork is valued at $10bn (<£7.65bn)
In 2015 WeWork employed more than 800 people, had 35,000 members and was valued at $10bn (=£7.6bn). By the end of 2015, WeWork had 56 co-working spaces in New York City, Boston, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Washington DC, Austin, Miami, Berkeley, Chicago, Portland, Seattle and San Francisco, as well as international locations in London, Amsterdam and Israel. The growth, however, took a toll on WeWork employees. One former employee told Vanity Fair. “We would joke that we worked like slaves. Adam would have meetings on Sunday, and you could never miss those. And sometimes it wouldn’t happen, or it’d happen hours late and you’d be there all night. You’d cry in the bathroom all the time.” 2016: WeWork launches WeLive Having dominated the co-working sector, WeWork set its sights on со-living with its WeLive launch. The initial WeLive outpost was in the same building as WeWork’s Wall Street location in Manhattan, and the concept saw fully furnished units with amenities such as a laundry room, yoga studio, espresso bar and happy hours. The concept intended to create a community. In a 2016 interview with Fast Company, Rebekah revealed just how intertwined the Neumanns were with WeWork. She said: “We don’t have a line at all between work and life. It’s not even a blurred line. There is no line.” 2017: International expansion continues and WeGrow announced According to Vanity Fair, when Rebekah returned from maternity leave in 2017 she reportedly decided she wanted to become the company’s chief brand officer, a role that SoulCycle co-founder fulie Rice had been recruited for. Rice quit the company soon afterwards. Hot off the heels of WeLive, Rebekah announced plans for WeGrow in November 2017, a private school for children from the age of three until grade four. Children between five and
eight would take classes on sales techniques, brand building and supply and demand. “We couldn’t find the school that we felt would nurture growth,” Rebekah told Fast Company/ at the time. “These children come into the world, they are very evolved, they are very special. They’re spiritual. They’re all natural entrepreneurs, natural humanitarians, and then it seems like we squash it all out of them in the education system.” After opening locations in South Korea in 2016, WeWork opened a 2,200-seater community workspace in India’s Bangalore in 2017, followed by several workspaces in Japan’s capital of Tokyo. This year also saw WeWork partner with Airbnb with the aim to allow business travellers to stay in Airbnbs and book a desk at a WeWork. The company also opened its first permanent gym in Manhattan, Rise by We. According to Bustle, as the company grew, “Adam expected deputies to show up for Kabbalah meditation classes and tequila- addled midnight meetings, and their children opened up lemonade stands in the office”. Another report from Business Insider claimed that Rebekah’s preference for white-only technology once led staff to buy a can of white paint and paint her desktop phone. 2018: WeWork faces sexual assault lawsuit and Rebekah makes ‘anti-feminist’ statement at Summer Camp In 2018, the same year Neumann reportedly purchases a $60m (£45-9m) private jet, the Financial Times reported WeWork lost $219,000 (<£167,600) every hour of every day between March 2018 and March 2019. It added that its losses and revenue both doubled. Executives told Vanity Fair that this was the same year that Rebekah fired a mechanic who worked on the company’s Gulfstream because she “didn’t like his energy”.
It was at this year’s Summer Camp — which saw 8,000 people, mostly WeWork employees, gather at Eridge Park in East Sussex — that Rebekah made a statement some saw as “anti-feminist”. According to Property Week, Rebekah pointed at Adam’s sister, Adi Neumann, in the front row of their talk and said: “I’m so grateful you took care of Adam.” Rebekah added, speaking of WeWork: “You helped him create the biggest family in the world. A big part of being a woman is to help men [like Adam] manifest their calling in life.” The festival that year also featured a panel event where the Neumanns spoke about the success of their relationship. One attendee told The New Yorker'. “I was kind of grossed out by this whole religious, heteronormative undertone to everything.” In October of 2018, a complaint was filed in the Manhattan Supreme Court which detailed former employee Ruby Anaya’s allegations against the company. Anaya began working at WeWork in 2014 and claimed she had been groped by two different employees at two company events where “attendance was mandatory and alcohol was readily available”. Anaya said she immediately reported both incidents to HR but claimed that WeWork “didn’t take action” and managers began to “shut her out of work projects” before her contract was terminated in August 2018. At the time she said the company was emblematic of an “entitled, frat-boy culture that permeates [it] from the top down”. WeWork’s response was that Anaya was fired due to poor performance. It told Vox the claims were “meritless” and said “WeWork investigated this employee’s complaints, took appropriate action, and this employee was terminated solely because of her poor performance”.
Jared Leto and Anne Hathaway in ‘WeCrashed’ (Apple TV+/AP) 2019: WeWork rebrands to We Company, is valued at $47bn (<£35bn) and IPO fails In January of 2019, WeWork decided to rebrand as We Company, comprising three business units: WeWork, WeLive and WeGrow. In August 2019 it filed paperwork detailing its intent to go public. At this point it had been valued at $4bn (<£3bn) and had 500 locations across 29 countries. An initial public offering (IPO) or stock launch sees shares of a company sold to institutional and retail investors. In the month following the We Company filing its IPO paperwork, the valuation was cut down to $10bn (<£7.65bn). Then Adam Neumann was removed as CEO and the IPO was delayed indefinitely. There were a number of reasons for this fall in stock, but it was largely due to how profitable the company was. The IPO paperwork revealed that in 2018, WeWork lost $1.6bn (<£1.2bn) of its $1.8bn (<£1.3bn) in revenue, the company reportedly loaned millions to Neumann and other senior executives, and Neumann allegedly cashed out $700m (<£536m) from the company ahead of its IPO. In October the We Company’s biggest investor, Softbank, took over WeWork and Adam Neumann was given a $1.7bn (<£1.3bn)
golden parachute to step down as chairman of the board. In November 2019 WeWork laid off 2,400 employees. 2022: WeWork sees post-pandemic recovery Following more losses due to the pandemic and the rise of home working, WeWork has begun to build itself up again. It currently has 751 “open and coming soon” locations across 121 cities, according to its site. WeGrow was shut down at the end of 2019 and WeWork officially parted with WeLive in 2021, with its two locations — the other being in northern Virginia — handed over to the management of both buildings. In November 2021, at The New York Times DealBook Summit, Neumann made his first public comments two years on from being ousted from WeWork. He said: “It was never my intention for the company not to succeed, and not what they signed up for.” He added: “When you take equity and you’re trying a start-up, you take a risk. I wish it would have worked out differently for everybody.” Neumann said that the perception that he profited “while the company is going down” was “completely false”. Of his management style, he said WeWork had a “fun culture” and “for a long time—for seven years out of the nine I was there —it was working really well”. Neumann recently acquired the rights to WeGrow and has invested in a residential buildings start-up company. He and Rebekah currently live in their home in the Hamptons with their five children. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Section 2/ IndyBest TRENCII C( )NNECTI( )N From classic cuts to on-trend designs, Daisy Lester rounds up the best of a versatile coat that never goes out of fashion An enduring staple of our wardrobes, trench coats are a sartorial failsafe that we cherish year after year. Stylish, practical and lightweight to layer, they’re not only an ideal transitional piece, but a timeless investment. First worn by soldiers during the First World War, trench coats have since transcended their
military roots to become a staple of the fashion crowd and a holy grail of outerwear, thanks to their versatility and effortless aesthetic. Whether worn throughout autumn and winter over chunky knits, or thrown over dresses and jeans during the unpredictable British spring and summertime, trenches are an all-year-round purchase. While the classic beige trench style remains mostly unchanged since its first iterations, contemporary updates on the coat have led to denim, leather, borg, hooded and patent interpretations. Military-style trench coats were spotted all over the spring/summer 2022 collections, from Toteme and Burberry to Max Mara and Rejina Pyo; while leather trenches dominated the catwalks of Diesel and Prada. Denim is also enjoying a comeback this season and the material translates well to a trench coat. How we tested If you’re looking to invest in the capsule wardrobe essential, we’ve considered versatility, cost, style and longevity in our round-up of the best women’s trench coats you can buy right now - from timeless designs to on-trend styles and investment pieces. — BUY — indy/best Mango oversized cotton trench: <£89.99, Mango
Best: Overall Rating: 10/10 In keeping with a classic trench coat, Mango’s offering boasts large lapels, long sleeves with cuff loops, a back vent, adjustable belt and lightweight lining. Its slightly oversized fit is not only on trend but lends the piece to layering during the colder months, while its light khaki colourway harks back to the OG trench from Burberry (though costing around <£1,300 less). Detailing such as the spread collar and sweeping peak lapels - emphasised by the lack of buttons - help make the Mango trench a statement coat for everyday wear. Buy now Axel Arigato globe trench coat: <£345, Axel Arigato Best: Military trench Rating: 10/10 This utilitarian-style trench from Swedish label, Axel Arigato, epitomises the brand’s minimalist and sleek aesthetic. In addition to the tie belt to offset the coat’s boxy shape, the brand’s contemporary take on the traditional trench is double buttoned down the front with wide lapels and an Axel Arigato pin on the chest to add interest. There’s extra practicality with the storm flap, vent in the hem and side pockets while the
trench’s olive hue is a colour trend to take note of for 2022. Though costly, this classic cut is a lifetime investment. Buy now Kitri Leona pink colourblock faux-leather coat: <£245, Kitri Leona Best: Statement trench coat Rating: 9/10 Searching for a bold piece of outerwear to brighten up your spring? Kitri’s faux-leather trench is the answer. The complementary colour block hues of berry, pink and ivory are teamed with the slightly oversized and comfortable fit that makes the trench ideal for layering. Its boxy, straight length cut has two roomy patch pockets and can be cinched in with the berry coloured tie belt, while the patent faux-leather finish is a cool take on the classic trench. Style Kitri’s coat with a neutral ensemble underneath and let the trench take centre stage. Buy now
Weekday Travis oversized trench coat: <£130, Weekday Best: For layering Rating: 8/10 If you’re after a neutral-hued trench with an oversized fit for layering up, Weekday’s Travis coat fits the bill. The long-length coat is made from a sturdy and lightweight cotton twill that’s breathable for spring, boasting raglan sleeves and cuff button detailing with a vent at the back. Lined and belted, it’s insulated enough for the colder months, making it an all-year-round staple. Buy now
Reformation Holland trench: <£290, Reformation Best: Classic trench Rating: 9/10 Reformation’s Holland trench is a classic, and if you’ve got the budget it’s a coat that can transition you through the seasons. Boasting a relaxed silhouette throughout and double-breasted button front closure, there’s also a detachable belt for the option of a more fitted look. The American label’s trench offers great length, too, that’s emphasised by the epaulet on the shoulders. It’s been such a hit already this year that it keeps selling out, so pre-order your size now to avoid missing out. Buy now
The Frankie Shop yule trench coat, pale khaki: £289.91, The Frankie Shop Best: Oversized trench coat Rating: 8/10 The Frankie Shop has made a name for itself in fashion with its sharp tailoring, oversized silhouettes and minimalist staples - all of which feed into the label’s yulu trench coat. The lightweight cotton-nylon blend canvas comes in an oversized fit that is emphasised by the batwing sleeves. Interest is added with the double-button closure, belted cuffs, pointed lapel collar and throat latch, as well as the storm flap. We’d recommend sizing down if you don’t want too much volume in the trench. Buy now
Jigsaw Freya twill trench coat: <£135, Jigsaw Best: Twill trench coat Rating: 8/10 Inject some pastel blue into your spring wardrobe with Jigsaw’s trench. One for the colder months, the wool and polyester blend creates a warming twill coat that can be cinched in with the coordinating leather and metal eyelet belt. Smart tailoring details such as the notch lapels, welt pockets, dropped shoulders and fitted silhouette makes this trench a capsule wardrobe classic and a nice option for the office or formal occasions. The best news? It’s currently reduced by 50 per cent. Buy now
Warehouse borg collar utility wool trench: <£38, Warehouse Best: Check trench coat Rating: 8/10 Breaking away from the classic neutral hues of trench coats, Warehouse’s contemporary checked iteration is crafted from wool for extra warmth - making it an ideal investment for winter. The utilitarian fit is complete with borg detailing on the collar, two chest pockets, a matching check belt with a black buckle and cuff belts. Buy now
Nasty Gal hooded oversized belted trench coat: £87.20, Nasty Gal Best: Hooded trench coat Rating: 8/10 If you’re on the lookout for something as practical as it is stylish, this hooded trench from Nasty Gal ticks all the boxes. Boasting an oversized, longline fit, a deep V neck line, flowing lapels and drop sleeves with fitted cuffs, it’s the ideal layering piece. The tie belt allows you to cinch in the voluminous silhouette while the hood arms you against the unpredictable British spring and summertime. Its neutral beige colourway means it can be thrown over anything from a tracksuit to jeans or a midi dress. Buy now Urban Outfitters Tasha faux fur trim trench coat: £89, Urban Outfitters Best: Leather trench Rating: 9/10 The Y2K revival is still reigning and Urban Outfitters’ fur- trimmed leather trench is the perfect way to channel classic Noughties style. The coat’s patent-leather finish was spotted all over the spring/summer collections and Urban’s faux-leather
take feels far more premium than its price tag. The coat boasts a sharp V neck, single button and matching faux-leather belt tie, complete with a faux-shearling collar and cuffs that makes the trench feel very Almost Famous. Buy now Warehouse denim oversized trench coat: =£79.20, Warehouse Best: Denim trench Rating: 9/10 Who knew denim could work so well in trench coat form? We certainly didn’t until we discovered this Warehouse number. Top-to-toe denim is everywhere for SS22 and this interpretation of the trend retains all the traditional trench coat signatures with its double-breasted style, belted detailing, fitted cuffs, double- button closure and back vent. The vintage finish of the denim is teamed with an oversized fit that gives it an effortless feel. If you’re feeling brave, pair it with denim jeans for a Y2K-infused look; alternatively, dress it down with a mini dress or contrasting white jeans. Buy now
Asos Design oversized trench in stone: <£75, Asos Best: Sharp collared trench Rating: 9/10 Asos’s relaxed and vintage-inspired trench is the ideal everyday staple. The oversized coat has a polyester composition that makes it lightweight for layering. Coming in a classic beige hue that’s contrasted by the sharp navy corduroy collar, there’s also a wide tie waist that helps give a silhouette to the boxy shape. And at under £80, it’s an investment piece that won’t break the bank. Buy now
AllSaints Mixie trench coat: <£299, AllSaints Best: For check detailing Rating: 9/10 Classic on the front and unique on the back, AllSaints’ Mixie trench is a sophisticated transitional piece. Its light beige colourway works in contrast to the six black buttons, while the boxy double-breasted overlay, welt pockets and cuff tabs add sharp detailing. The contrasting check storm flap and AllSaints logo breaks tradition from the classic trench and helps it feel distinctly modern. Though an investment, it feels first-rate with its cotton composition - helping make it a season-upon-season staple. Buy now The verdict Timeless and affordable, Mango’s oversized and lightweight coat is a wardrobe mainstay that has all the bells and whistles of a classic trench - from its large lapels to tie belt. If you’re looking for a year-on-year investment, splash out on Axel Arigato’s olive-hued, military-inspired trench or AllSaints’ contemporary take on the beige trench. For those wanting something that breaks away from tradition, Kitri’s colourblock
coat is a bold statement while Warehouse’s denim trench is an on-trend take. Voucher codes For the latest discounts on jackets, coats and other fashion offers, try the links below: • Asos discount codes • Very discount codes Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Section 2/ TV Review THE THRILL IS GONE The rakish Regency charms of Bridgerton are back, but for Nick Hilton, there’s something amiss, giving this opening episode of the second season the uneasy feeling of a spin-off Ready for their close-up: Charithra Chandran and Jonathan Bailey (Netflix) To call Bridgerton “Jane Austen with sex” would do a disservice to both parties. But when it first aired in 2020, Netflix’s
adaptation of Julia Quinn’s novels inevitably drew that trite observation. It is, after all, a show that embraces the conventions of social class, stately homes and slow-burn wooing that Austen has popularised for two centuries. If Austen is buttoned-up, unrequited and implicit, then Bridgerton rendered the same dynamics in overt, even garish colours - not to mention a smattering of breasts and buttocks. And where Austen is favoured by folk who are horny for etiquette, Bridgerton catered to an even larger demographic: people who are just plain horny. As it returns, the show hopes to pick up where it left off, tonally if not narratively. Bridgerton is, fundamentally, about courtship, not marriage. Hence Daphne (Phoebe Dynevor) and Simon (Rege-Jean Page), the Duchess and Duke of Hastings, are shuffled out of the pack, and replaced by a bevy of childless singletons. Foremost amongst the new arrivals are the Sharma sisters, Kate and Edwina (Sex Education’s Simone Ashley and Alex Rider’s Charithra Chandran respectively). The Sharmas represent an inversion of Sense and Sensibility’s core dichotomy: Edwina, the Marianne figure, wants to marry “a prince or duke”, while her older sister Kate - the Eleanor - urges her to marry for love. Yet Kate is the responsible “old maid”, terrifyingly considered, at 26, of too advanced years to find a husband of her own. Of the extant cast, the plot reins are passed predominantly to Jonathan Bailey’s chaotic Anthony Bridgerton and his truculent younger sister Eloise, played by Line of Duty’s Claudia Jessie. Anthony, having been ditched by his opera singer squeeze, is on the hunt for a wife. He pursues Edwina, who has won Queen Charlotte’s title of “diamond of the season”, whilst flirting incessantly with her sister, and guardian, Kate. Eloise, meanwhile, has “come out” but is desperately avoiding all possible suitors. Just as importantly, Penelope Featherington (Derry Girls’ Nicola Goughian) has now been unmasked (to viewers at least) as Lady Whistledown, which removes one of the central mysteries of Bridgerton, even if it allows us to witness the methodology of someone labelled an “insipid wallflower” by her peers.
‘Bridgerton’ harbours no illusions about what it is: a profoundly unsubtle opportunity to see beautiful, bonneted people tup by candlelight The reset of this new series of Bridgerton is, it must be said, a touch harsh. The entire central dilemma (and the very attractive couple seeking to resolve it) of the first season has been excised, giving this opening episode - “Capital-R-Rake” - the feeling of a spin-off. They might as well have renamed the entire show The Other Bridgertons. And on a spectrum running from Frasier to Joey, The Other Bridgertons would be somewhere in the middle: a more trivial work than its parent, but not without its charms. The reality is that Daphne, for all her doe-eyes and baby hairs, was a less charismatic Bridgerton than either Anthony or Eloise. Indeed, in her proto-feminist, anti-establishment leanings, Eloise always had a stronger sense of Main Character Energy than her elder sister (she has begun reading Mary Wollstonecraft, labelled “rather haughty” by Penelope, in the off-season absence of Lady Whistledown’s gossip rag). All the same, the new season lacks the romantic vigour of Simon’s tortured pursuit of Daphne - the dynamic between Kate and Anthony (all rather transparently Lizzie Bennett and Mr Darcy) feels much more forced. And Jonathan Bailey, even with a razor applied to his period facial hair, felt more convincing and comfortable as the wayward son than the romantic lead. But look, sometimes television criticism, like television itself, is best served by erring towards the facile. And Bridgerton
harbours no illusions about what it is: a profoundly unsubtle opportunity to see beautiful, bonneted people tup by candlelight. From the overdressed sets - which have the same aesthetic as a WeWork on Valentine’s Day - to the overdressed cast, it is a show that indulges our basest qualities, but does so delightfully. Bridgerton might be close to losing the plot, but be honest with yourself: you weren’t watching for that anyway. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Section 2/ TV review Dumbing down treatment for ‘ghost of the mountain’ The urge to narrativise and anthropomorphise is irresistible in new BBC animal series ‘Dynasties IT, writes Nick Hilton Cameraman Diego Araya gets up close to puma Rupestre during filming (ВВС/Vicente Montero) At 95, David Attenborough has been around for so long, and worked so prolifically, that there’s scarcely an animal or region
that hasn’t fallen under the spell of his reassuringly avuncular growl. From the skies to the seas, the desert to the tundra, Attenborough has covered every blade of grass and turned every stone. So it’s natural that in his twilight years he is alighting upon subjects with slightly less grandeur or urgency than the halcyon peaks of Planet Earth and Blue Planet. Enter Dynasties II. The premise of the Dynasties franchise, now in its second iteration, is simple. Each episode follows a different endangered species through the cycle of bringing their young into adulthood. This new series opens with an episode tracking the lives of Chile’s pumas, the big cats who prowl the desolate landscape of Patagonia. The mother cat - Rupestre - is attempting to safely navigate her four cubs through the harsh South American winter, facing off against both the elements and the intramural barbarity of their fellow pumas. The puma - or the “ghost of the mountains”, as Dynasties II calls the species - is an interesting subject. They lack the inherent glamour of the tiger or lion (they would not, for example, make good corporate mascots for cereal or chocolate bars), looking instead like they are hewn out of granite, or the very landscape from which they emerge. And that landscape - the Torres del Paine national park - is equally stark, looking more like the Scottish Highlands than the rain and cloud forests of South America. Attention will turn, in the second episode of the series, to the well-trod tracks of the Kenyan elephant. But the greatest strength of this opener is the low-key, almost discreet, presence of the puma and the graphic loneliness of the landscape. It could be lifted from the films of Nuri Bilge Ceylan or Terrence Malick.
‘He wants to mate with Rupestre,’ Attenborough reveals of an enormous male cat. ‘But first he will try to kill her cubs’ But for all the arthouse sensibility of the cinematography, Dynasties II also represents the feted BBC Natural History Unit at its most simplistic. The urge to narrativise and anthropomorphise the pumas is irresistible. “Under their mother’s watchful eye, each is settling in well to life as a puma,” Attenborough announces, as though being a puma were an occupation no more complex than plumbing or accountancy. This imposition of humanity onto the pumas runs all the way through to giving them names (the one-eyed enemy female is glibly called “Blinker”), something that is deeply silly the more you think about it. This rather cutesy depiction is infrequently punctuated by narration that highlights the brutal reality of “life as a puma”. “He wants to mate with Rupestre,” Attenborough reveals of an enormous male cat. “But first he will try to kill her cubs.” At the end of all this humanoid drama, the feline instinct reasserts itself. “Rupestre has one thing left to do,” Attenborough declares, “leave her family.” She walks off into the snow, following some inscrutable biological impulse to desertion. Dynasties II, in aiming half its gaze at children, is guilty of dumbing down the great complexity of the animal brain. But for all the absent sophistication, the puma - “Patagonia’s most charismatic predator” - has the same instinctive appeal as the gravelly voice that tells its story.
Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Section 2/ TV review PLIGHT BRIGADE The well-meaning, 15-minute monologues in ‘Skint’ about life under the Tories miss the mark, writes Sean O’Grady ‘Derry Girls’ star Saoirse-Monica Jackson plays Tara, a broke waitress (ВВС/Hopscotch Films) If you need a bit of respite from war, Covid and hyperinflation then may I just gently steer you away from the BBC’s Skinf! The first quartet (of six) 15-minute monologues feel very much as though a commissioning editor has given four rather earnest writers each the task of dramatising key passages about life
under this wicked Tory government from a Jeremy Corbyn speech - homelessness, the mental health crisis, the social care crisis, the horrors of gentrification, zero hours contracts and more. The general effect is to confirm what you already know or fear about the plight of the poor; but also that there is absolutely sod all that you, or indeed a television screenwriter, can do about it. Of the four, the one about a waitress driven mad by class-based hatred is by far the most compelling, precisely because it takes us away from real-life squalor and deftly lands us in something like a scene from a Saw movie. Aptly titled “I’d Like to Speak to the Manager” and written by Lisa McGee, it features Saoirse- Monica Jackson as Tara, a hard-working, poorly paid waitress who finds herself unbearably patronised by some drunk, entitled, filthy rich diner who has inherited far more money than Tara and her entire family would earn in a lifetime. The snobby woman humiliates Tara by summoning her manager to complain about getting the order for the starters wrong (though Tara did no such thing). So Tara follows her home, ties her up and tells her, and us, exactly what’s wrong with the established social order. You instantly recognise Jackson from Derry Girls, and there’s really no one in the business who does intense, indignant nuttiness quite like she does. The only thing wrong with her rant about life’s unfairness is that it ends not with the literal evisceration of a particularly unpleasant product of the class system, but with the ultimate cop-out - as Tara turns to the camera and declares: “Next time I might.” So it was all a fantasy. It’s a bit anticlimactic, that, as if Lenin, or Corbyn for that matter, had decided on second thoughts he can’t be bothered with tearing down the capitalist system after all.
His intoxication, anger and mental confusion actually means we can! quite understand what happened and is happening to him The other monologists are also engaging, but have to work hard when the scripting doesn’t quite add up, and they occasionally look like they’re slogging through a claim for universal credit. In “Hannah”, by Kerry Hudson, Emma Fryer makes a fine job of playing a homeless mum wandering around Great Yarmouth trying to find a bed for the night. We’re invited to believe that she had been chucked out of her hostel because she threw a tantrum after the greedy landlady ate an entire red velvet cake she’d made for her baby’s birthday. Besides, the camera ends up being quite kind to Yarmouth beach, which is maybe not the desired effect. Michael Socha is as convincing as he can be in “No Grasses, No Nonces”, written by Byron Vincent. He plays Jambo, a man in early middle age recalling the experience of adolescent sexual molestation and drug abuse while getting blind drunk in the worst pub in Derby. Fine, but his intoxication, anger and mental confusion actually means we can’t quite understand what happened and is happening to him. The fourth monologue, which is the most bewildering, concerns mushrooms, leaseholder rights and property developers, and actually uses time-lapse footage of fungi to make some point about urban redevelopment schemes. Gabriel Gbadamosi’s well- meaning tale is undermined by Gary Beadle playing the part of a
market trader threatened by eviction, who behaves like he’s actually done quite nicely for himself and is well aware of the value of his lease contract. With his bowls of lovely, fresh, exotic mushrooms, he hardly looks skint; more like he might appear as a successful small businessman in the next Conservative manifesto, giving the thumbs up next to Boris Johnson smiling inanely in a white grocer’s coat. Confusing on every level, that one. The monologues mostly make the case that even if you work hard, stick to the script, follow directions, and apply yourself to the task in hand, the system still makes your life difficult. Sadly, in Skint, it seems as though that applies to some of our best television actors just as much as the rest of us. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Business/ Inside Business Home owners are paying out far less than renters Long term it’s a lot cheaper to buy, but it’s not for everyone (PA) JAMES MOORE CHIEF BUSINESS COMMENTATOR Pity the poor tenants in the rental sector. Poor being the operative word, based on figures from the Halifax. Housing costs make them a lot worse off than owner-occupiers if they’re in the private rented sector. According to the lender, homeowners’ costs were <£1,378 less than those of tenants in 2021 across the UK.
Now, it’s true that Halifax has an interest here. It is owned by Lloyds Banking Group, which is Britain’s biggest lender. Promoting home ownership is in its DNA. A figure like that shows off its benefits to great effect. However, it probably won’t come as a great surprise. Halifax’s data, based on a three-bedroom house, a typical first- time-buyer property, goes back to 2008 and during that time the gap has at points during that time been narrower. But it has also been quite a bit wider too. It stands to reason that renting will cost more when the costs are evened out. The tenant, if not in subsidised social housing, will be paying the owner’s costs, risk premium, and profit margin. True, the buyer has to scrape together a deposit, usually at least 5 per cent of their property’s value. Higher is obviously better because they’ll get a better deal on the mortgage that way. But that counts as an investment. Not only will the capital outlay reduce the buyer’s housing costs over time, it is the first step in the purchase of an asset, one which should eventually reduce those costs to near zero, with the exception of repairs and maintenance. Getting on the ladder would therefore appear to be the smart thing to do, even today with house prices having taken off like one of Elon Musk’s space toys. That is, if you can. Rents have, anyway, been on the same trajectory. Landlords’ “void” periods - when a property sits vacant - have also fallen according to an analysis rental portal Rentd put out a couple of weeks back. Private sector tenants’ rights are also quite limited. They can be turfed out at relatively short notice if and when the landlord decides that it’s time to sell up and book their gains. All in all it is not a particularly attractive option, certainly not when compared to other parts of the world where renting is the norm and tenants see their residences as their homes. It can be quite to do that in Britain’s private rented sector.
It certainly helps to explain why government-sponsored schemes designed to help people get on to the first rung of the housing ladder have proved so popular, even if they are ultimately self-destructive through adding fuel to an overheating market. But while renting may not be the cheapest (or the most economically rewarding) option, it remains the preferred option for some and the only option for others. It is thus a sector ripe for reform, and at a faster pace than at present. The key problem for both sectors, however, ultimately remains a lack of supply. Addressing that has repeatedly been dashed on the altar of the nimbyism that seems endemic to the Tory shires. So buy if you can, I suppose. Even if the market slows a bit - and it should do that as interest rates rise and affordability declines - the fundamentals will keep it supplied with all the high-grade fuel it needs, fuel which will continue to keep the price of properties uncomfortably high whether that is for renters or for prospective buyers looking at Halifax’s numbers. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Business/ Comment Complacency has no place in the hospitality industry The cost of living is affecting us all, writes Caroline Bullock, but shouldn’t we at least get decent service for our money? The rising costs of energy, food, labour and insurance were always going to bite (Getty/iStock) The cost of living crisis inevitably draws focus to the extreme: those facing the stark choices between eating and heating, or forfeiting their own evening meal to ensure their kids have food. I recall a recent sorry snapshot playing out in an isolated Scottish village, where residents struggled to heat their homes,
their lives consumed by the latest reading on the pay-as-you-go gas meters. One woman, her breath visible in the icy air of her front room, spent her evening adding layers of clothing at set intervals, delaying the warmest to the end to try to eke out the benefit until, to her relief, it was time to go to bed. Some 400 miles away in a tea room in the West Sussex market town of Arundel, well-heeled pensioners and young families were mooching around antique shops and choosing where to have lunch. On the surface, at least, the living squeeze may be less keenly felt, yet this is a wide-reaching issue, and even here the effects were filtering through in more oblique ways, with some service providers potentially sleepwalking into a crisis of their own. Take the tea room in question: all wooden beams and olde worlde shtick, but oddly lacking in charm. At the counter, a customer had just been handed a bill for <£83 - it caught my attention because I didn’t recall the menu offering lobster or truffle egg pasta alongside the cheesy wedges and toasted sandwiches (superfluously billed as “homemade”). The customer was also surprised, only half joking as they offered to do the washing up for a discount, and returned to their table to start the stewards’ enquiry into how the bill had escalated. A bit like this month’s record rise in petrol and diesel prices, which stood at 183.9 pence and 189.9 pence per litre respectively at a service station in the Sussex village of Pease Pottage on the A23, the stranger’s tea-room bill seemed to represent a significant turning point. How have we reached a stage where a (not very good) eatery peddling the usual staples can charge that kind of money with a straight face? Inevitably, the rising costs of energy, food, labour and insurance were always going to bite. Some 93 per cent of the 680 businesses surveyed by UK Hospitality last month said they intended to increase prices, by an average of 11 per cent. Yet there’s a balance for businesses to strike between absorbing those costs and offering some value. Surely the onus should also be on the service provider to try to offset the steeper prices,
perhaps with really good service and a bit of effort - something all too often lacking in the current operating environment, where the complacency can be staggering. The indifference of the worst offenders, I believe, stems from the assumption that they will always have a captive audience. Most midweek outings I’ve made to coastal and market towns in recent times confirm that it is the grey pound that is propping up the local economy, whether it’s in the restaurants and cafes or browsing the antique emporiums and independent bookshops, galleries and gift shops. Service with a smile this wasn’t, and it didn’t pick up even for the big spenders - the man leaving over £80 lighter, whose departing ‘goodbye’ went unanswered by oblivious staff According to a report by think tank the International Longevity Centre, spending by those aged 65 and over increased by 75 per cent between 2001 and 2018, compared with a 16 per cent fall in spending by those aged 50 and under during the same period. Yet it would be a big mistake for operators to assume this cohort will be immune to the cost-of-living hikes, and content to keep paying ever more as inflation erodes their savings and pensions. The sixtysomething customer who was charged £83 in the tea room is a case in point. Enthusing over his latest weekend away with elegant friends, he fitted the mould of someone the cafe owner may have assumed wouldn’t be watching the pennies, but
his reaction, and the departing comments of his group, suggested that they wouldn’t be returning. And nor will I. A cursory flick through the last several Tripadvisor reviews confirms that my own poor experience there was fairly typical. “Frostiness” came up repeatedly - a characteristic that has no place in the hospitality environment. For me, the impression was instant: I was left waiting to be seated while staff who knew I was there continued to talk among themselves, without any welcome or acknowledgement. It got worse when I asked to change table away from an open door and a cold draught, and was led to an alternative seat in silence by a waitress with a face like thunder. I did wonder what specific inconvenience this caused for her, other than picking up the menu and walking a few metres, but it will have to remain a mystery. Service with a smile this wasn’t, and it didn’t pick up even for the big spenders - the man leaving over =£80 lighter, whose departing ‘goodbye’ went unanswered by oblivious staff. It’s odd, after a pandemic that almost brought the hospitality sector to its knees, that some operators seem to have returned slacker and more contemptuous of their clientele. It’s evident in the ever more blurred line between what constitutes a takeaway cafe service and what counts as a sitting-in experience, which I don’t recall being so ambiguous beforehand. When querying the reluctance to provide crockery in one cafe, which had served me tea in a paper cup and a pastry in a bag as I sat in, I was informed that this was ‘a takeaway service with indoor seating’. A shame the prices didn’t reflect that, as well as the inconvenience of there not being a toilet or hand-washing facility. I think some of this could be a legacy of the switch to takeaways at the height of the pandemic, and the attendant shortcuts that lazier operators have latched onto without adjusting their prices. It’s a shame that the resourcefulness and effort that defined the response of so many independent cafes at the time is increasingly making way for complacency and excuses.
Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Sport/ Football Liverpool punish Forest to Nottingham Forest Liverpool Jota(78) Diogo Jota was ruled to be onside after scoring Liverpool’s late winner last night (Getty) MARK CRITCHLEY NORTHERN FOOTBALL CORRESPONDENT
This FA Cup quarter-final was contested by two clubs who, once upon a time, made up English football’s leading competitive rivalry. Liverpool’s hard-earned victory - delivered by a late Diogo Jota goal - has set up its modern day equivalent in the semi-finals, against Manchester City at Wembley next month. Yet a resurgent Nottingham Forest will have ended this breathless tie wondering what might have been. What if, minutes before Jota’s decisive goal, Philip Zinckernagel had converted the best chance of the game up until that point? What if a contentious late penalty call had gone against Alisson and in favour of Ryan Yates, who had rounded the Liverpool goalkeeper, went to ground and was told to get to his feet? What if Forest had taken the Premier League title contenders to extra time, as had started to seem likely? Steve Cooper and his players will replay those moments in their heads after missing out on a first semi-final since 1991, though should not let them take anything away from a performance that warranted at least another half hour and perhaps the lottery of a penalty shoot-out. Liverpool were the superior side, as expected, but were made to sweat for their first semi-final showing under Jurgen Klopp. This was the first edition of this fixture in 23 years and the first FA Cup meeting between the two clubs since the semi-final replay in 1989, three weeks after the Hillsborough disaster. A lot has changed in the intervening period, at both clubs and beyond. But despite the echoes of history and all that has happened since, the City Ground crackled in anticipation of what was to come. Cooper, once a coach at Liverpool’s academy, has built an energetic, young side since his appointment in September. This run to the quarter-finals of the world’s oldest cup competition, which has claimed the scalps of two most recent FA Cup winners in Arsenal and Leicester City, has only lent credence to the belief that he can lift the two-time European champions out from more than two decades of mediocrity.
Liverpool may be known for the fast, unrelenting tempo to their play but their hosts for the evening were happy to match it. Forest were first to their opponents when out of possession - the combative Yates, in particular - and on the front foot once they regained it. Joe Lolley might have converted Zinckernagel’s low cross to the far post after only eight minutes yet hesitated and sent the ball back for where it came for Naby Keita to clear. Diogo Jota’s late goal settled a frantic FA Cup tie (Liverpool FC via Getty Images) That was the clearest sight of Alisson’s goal that Forest had during a first half that Liverpool grew into and gradually dominated, though they created few clear openings of their own. A lot of them fell to back-up left-back Kostas Tsimikas, who sent a couple of shots fizzing over the crossbar. On the other wing, Liverpool were missing the vision and imagination of Trent Alexander-Arnold, who sat out with a hamstring injury. Indeed, for all their possession during that first half, Klopp’s side were presented with their best opportunity by Jack Colback, whose wayward pass played Roberto Firmino through one-on- one with goalkeeper Ethan Horvath. The United States international stood tall in his goalmouth, which only made Firmino’s decision to try and chip him all the more curious. Horvath swatted his tame attempt away with the contempt it deserved. At the other end, Alisson had been rather unoccupied in the Liverpool goal but a mis-hit pass under pressure at the start of the second half could easily have been punished if, in the
scramble to make something out of it, Keinan Davis had not strayed into an offside position. Still, Forest were surviving and putting up enough resistance to force Klopp into a quadruple substitution once the hour mark passed. Luis Diaz, Thiago, Jordan Henderson and Takumi Minamino were all thrown on at once but Forest continued to give as good as they got, making as much as possible from the counterattacking opportunities that intermittently came their way. Liverpool’s defence looked uncertain of how to deal with their transitions. Forest’s golden chance was still to come, too, but it would be wasted. Nottingham Forest appeal for a penalty late on (AFP via Getty Images) It fell to Zinckernagel and he was substituted shortly after stabbing wide from an unmarked position inside the Liverpool penalty area, having queued up to receive Brennan Johnson’s low cross on a rapid Forest counter-attack. To Alisson’s right, the Dane had an open half of the goal to aim at. Instead, he placed his shot to the goalkeeper’s left and well past the post and his wastefulness would be swiftly punished. Moments later, Jota showed the instinct that Zinckernagel had lacked when poking Tsimikas’s right-footed cross past Horvath. On first glance, Jota appeared to have strayed marginally offside, just past Tobias Figuereido’s shoulder, but he had in fact timed his dart in at the far post to perfection. After a VAR check, the
goal stood. Forest were not beaten yet, though, and hoped the technology would work in their favour on Yates’s penalty claim. Alisson had come off his line somewhat late to meet the midfielder, who was slipped through on goal late on. Yates’ touch was heavy, the ball was going wide and if he is honest, he might admit that he left his foot there to clipped by the onrushing goalkeeper. There was contact, though, and referee Craig Pawson deferred to his video assistant. It was a marginal call but one that went in Liverpool’s favour and ended the cup run of their rejuvenated old rivals. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Sport/ Football Foden stunner ends Saints dream as City march on Southampton Laporte (45+2 og) Manchester City Sterling (12), De Bruyne (62 pen), Foden (75), Mahrez (78) Phil Foden celebrates his strike that put Manchester City 3-1 up at St Mary’s SONIA TWIGG
Phil Foden’s stunning strike capped off a dominant Manchester City performance to book their place in the FA Cup semi-finals with a 4-1 win over Southampton at St Mary’s. Pep Guardiola’s side had failed to win either Premier League game against the Saints this season, but their emphatic victory kept them on course for a treble. Raheem Sterling had handed the league leaders an early advantage, tapping home in the 12th minute, but it was cancelled out by Aymeric Laporte’s own goal just before half- time. The hosts fought hard with the scores level, but were deflated when Kevin De Bruyne’s 62nd-minute penalty restored City’s lead. City’s performance was capped off by a well-struck left-footed shot from the edge of the box from Foden in the 75th minute, with Riyad Mahrez also putting his name on the scoresheet three minutes later. Southampton started brightly and almost had an early breakthrough when Adam Armstrong was played in behind the City defence, but his slightly scuffed shot rolled back off the far post. Moments later Manchester City took the lead, when Sterling scored his first goal since February 15. Jack Stephens failed to clear his lines, allowing Gabriel Jesus to attack the loose ball and play in Sterling in the centre of the box, and the England forward made no mistake slotting home via a slight deflection off Tino Livramento.
City players celebrate their final goal by Mahrez (Getty) Fraser Forster had to be alert in the 27th minute as he made an instinctive diving save to deny Ilkay Gundogan from close range, just managing to tip the ball on to the post before Kyle Walker- Peters cleared the ball away from Jesus. Oriol Romeu had a chance to level the tie just before the break, but his well-hit effort from the edge of the box was straight at City goalkeeper Zack Steffen. The hosts did equalise just before the interval when Mohamed Elyounoussi beat the offside trap and his shot was deflected into his own net by Laporte. At the start of the second half Southampton worked well to break down City’s attacks and disrupt their playing style, while they had attempts of their own, including a James Ward-Prowse strike from range that Steffen was able to gather. But just as the home side looked to be on top, Guardiola’s team retook the lead from a spot-kick awarded by referee Mike Dean after Mohammed Salisu brought down Jesus at the edge of the box with a needless foul. De Bruyne dispatched the penalty, beating Forster who had dived the right way. Southampton came close to levelling the score for the second time, but Steffen was alert to save Che Adams’s effort after he was played in. Foden all but secured his side’s place in the last four with his strike from distance, before the visitors added a fourth with just
over 10 minutes remaining when Mahrez hred past Forster. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Sport/ Football Son bags a brace as Spurs close gap on top four with derby win over West Ham Tottenham Hotspur Zouma (9, og), Son (24, 88) West Ham Benrahma (35) Son Heung-min celebrates his late goal that sealed the points (Tottenham Hotspur FC via Getty)
JONATHAN VEAL Son Heung-min’s double saw Tottenham register a huge win in the race for Champions League qualification as they beat West Ham 3-1. The forward was also involved in Kurt Zouma’s own goal, as Spurs made it four Premier League victories from five to close the gap on fourth-placed Arsenal. They are now three points behind the Gunners, who have a game in hand but still have to visit their north London rivals in a clash that is yet to be rescheduled. Antonio Conte’s men, who also climbed above the Hammers, will believe they have the momentum in the battle for the top four as they signed off for the international break in style. This was a damaging defeat for West Ham, who got on the scoresheet through Said Benrahma, in their own pursuit of the top four. They are six points behind Arsenal having played two games more. Winning the Europa League may now be their most realistic route of getting Champions League football next season. The Hammers’ exertions against Sevilla on Thursday night must have played a part as Tottenham made an impressive start and went ahead in the ninth minute, becoming the beneficiaries of another own goal. Spurs went ahead through a ninth-minute own goal (PA) Matt Doherty won the ball high up the field with some good pressing, Harry Kane squared to Son and the last touch came
from Zouma - the sixth time an opposition player has put through his own net against Spurs this season. West Ham should have levelled almost instantly as Eric Dier was muscled off the ball by Michail Antonio, but he drilled inches wide. A matter of inches also denied Spurs a second shortly afterwards as a forging run by Dejan Kulusevski, followed by a one-two with Kane, saw him break into the box before his pullback was turned onto a post by Son. The South Korean finally got his goal as Spurs doubled their lead in the 24th minute when he again paired up with Kane whose defence- splitting pass sent him clear. Son lashed the ball past Lukasz Fabianski with the aid of a deflection. Spurs were in total control, but they allowed West Ham back into the game 10 minutes before the break as they were punished for some poor defending. Doherty conceded a needless corner which was allowed to make its way to the far post where Benrahma was waiting to convert, having lost his marker. West Ham’s Kurt Zouma attempts to block a Son shot (PA) The second half was on a knife edge as both sides had chances in the first 15 minutes. Kane wasted a massive opportunity to make it 3-1 as a heavy first touch from Son’s through ball allowed Fabianski to come out and make a save, while Antonio blazed well over at the far post from Aaron Cresswell’s cross.
Spurs began to find space on the counter-attack and had Sergio Reguilon any sort of confidence in the penalty area he might have been able to extend the lead, but after two Kane passes put him in the clear, he first elected to go down looking for a penalty and then shot straight at Fabianski. The England captain was then guilty of missing a golden chance to wrap the game up with 10 minutes remaining. A clever pass by Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg played him in on goal but Kane skied his effort when trying to clip the ball over the goalkeeper. Spurs finally ensured it would not be a nervy finish as Son killed the game off in the 88th minute, latching on to Kane’s header and converting with ease for the pair’s 39th goal combination in the Premier League. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK to top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Sport/ Formula One Leclerc sparks Ferrari 1-2 in Bahrain as Red Bulls retire Max Verstappen (left) and Charles Leclerc fight for the lead during yesterday’s race (Getty) JAMIE BRAIDWOOD Charles Leclerc won the Bahrain Grand Prix and Carlos Sainz completed a sensational one-two for Ferrari as defending champion Max Verstappen failed to finish the season-opening race of the Formula One season. Verstappen suffered a technical issue with just three laps of the race remaining and Red Bull’s problems were compounded as
Sergio Perez also failed to finish the final lap, leaving Lewis Hamilton to unexpectedly complete the podium. Ferrari had not won a race in Formula One since the 2019 season but the Italian team looked to have made the biggest jump in terms of performance after displaying impressive pace in pre-season, and Leclerc converted from pole position to confirm that the Scuderia are set to be contenders once again this campaign. “So happy,” Leclerc said. “The last two years have been incredible difficult for the team. We’ve started in the best way possible way. Thank you to the guys who have supported us. It’s great to be back at the top.” “Ferrari is back, and it’s properly back with a one-two,” Sainz added. “The hard work is paying off and we are there.” After an off-season which brought a significant overhaul to Fl’s rules and regulations, designed to increase overtaking opportunities and make the racing more competitive, Leclerc and Verstappen’s thrilling duel earlier in the race offered a glimpse that the changes had been successful. Leclerc led from the opening lap, in which held off the charging Verstappen down the inside of Turn 1, and began to pull away from the Red Bull car. But the Monegasque driver came under pressure following the first set of pit stops, as he returned to the track to see Verstappen bearing down on him in his mirrors. Leclerc celebrates Ferrari’s first race win since 2019 (AFP/Getty)
It led to four laps of thrilling, wheel-to-wheel action, as Verstappen surged into the lead only for Leclerc to retake Pl four corners later. In the end, it did Verstappen and Red Bull more harm than good and the Dutchman had to drop away as he wore down his soft tyres. Leclerc was set for a comfortable victory but the race took a turn late on after Pierre Gasly’s Alpha Tauri caught on fire and led to a safety car with less than 10 laps remaining. Just 98 days after the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, it brought back memories of the late drama at last season’s title decider. Leclerc comfortably held off Verstappen at the restart but the 24-year- old, who was complaining about problems with heavy steering, soon came under pressure from Sainz. And with three laps to go, as Sainz made the pass to take P2, Verstappen appeared to lose power and was soon dropping like a stone. It led to the defending champion retiring into the pits and things went from bad to worse as Perez, who was coming under pressure from Hamilton, locked up heading into the start of the final lap. Mercedes came into the weekend insisting they had yet to develop a car to compete with Red Bull and Ferrari and although their overall performance proved that to be true, they still finished with Hamilton on the podium and George Russell fourth on his debut with the team. Kevin Magnussen secured a sensational fifth place for Haas on his return to the American team, who failed to score a single point last season, while McLaren suffered a nightmare weekend as Daniel Ricciardo and Lando Norris finished 14th and 15th respectively. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Sport/ Cricket Patient West Indies carve out Barbados Test draw A belligerent Kraigg Brathwaite is surrounded by England fielders yesterday (Getty) VITHUSHAN EHANTHARAJAH SPORTS FEATURE WRITER Another bore draw, albeit one that carried moments of intrigue. The second Test in Barbados ended in an anti-climatic draw. Another pitch has sapped the efforts of both sets of players for no reward. And yet, both West Indies and England have positives to nourish them between now and the third Test which begins on Thursday.
Just as it was in the first Test, England dashed and declared, only this time the target of 282 was too much for West Indies to entertain and the 65 overs too little to effectively manufacture 10 chances on a slow, unhelpful track. Even after four and a bit days of cricket on it. For all the effort and endeavour of Joe Root’s charges, only five wickets were produced. England’s enthusiasm hit a quick high with the fall of three wickets across 38 deliveries. Jack Leach got the first before Saqib Mahmood capped off an impressive debut with some devilish movement and bounce to get the tourists up and about. Given the conditions over the last five days, Mahmood stood out as a point of different, able to garner late movement with a slingy action, particular with the old ball. Leach would get a couple more, finishing with innings figures of three for 36 and ticking off 94-5 overs in the Test. You have to go back to January 1962 to find an England bowler who sent down more than that - Tony Lock with 115 overs against Pakistan. The honour, if not quite the spoils, was taken by an equally belligerent Kraigg Brathwaite. The captain’s 184 balls faced took every bit of sting out of England’s attack. An ever-present throughout those 65 overs, with 56 runs to his name for a thirty- fifth score of fifty of above in his career. He was pretty much always out in the middle: since Thursday, he had scratched his guard and repelled for 673 deliveries to score 216 for just once out. As ever once the captains shook hands, thoughts turned to whether Root might have declared that little earlier. But who’s to say Brathwaite wouldn’t have seen off those, too. The intent from Alex Lees and Zak Crawley was there from the off as they started yesterday on 40 for no loss. They ticked off their first half-century stand as an opening duo before Lees’ noble attempt to slog-sweep Veerasamy Permaul was caught on the square leg boundary by Alzarri Joseph. A second came the left-arm spinner’s way, again through an awry slog-sweep: this time John Campbell taking the catch running in. Catch of the day, though, went to Jayden Seales for a sprint and dive at long
leg to catch Crawley (40) after he was rushed on a hook shot by Joseph. England and the West Indies head to Grenada with the series on the line (Getty Images) That brought Lawrence and Ben Stokes together at 74 for three, leading by 170, neither with a run or ball to the name but both with the capacity to change that quickly. After a bit of settling in, Stokes lifted Kemar Roach over cover for four, then smeared a six over midwicket. The following over, Lawrence snapped his wrists to hit Joseph into the stands of the same side. That impetus was snuffed out by yet more rain on 106 for three, the lead at 202. Unfortunately by the time play was able to restart, overs had been lost meaning only 72 remained in the day with both lunch and tea still come. The players returned and, six balls later, Stokes (19) was walking back the other way, drilling Roach straight to cover. In came Jonny Bairstow and so continued the selfless batting: two sixes and a four in his 29 off 25 before holing it down the ground to Roach for Seales’ first dismissal of the innings. Lawrence continued on, two sixes of his own amid swam of excellently delivered yorkers. As the last of the decent hitters, he had to farm the strike from Ben Foakes and eventually fell attempting an outlandish lasso of a straight hit that nestled into the hands of Joseph to gives Seales figures of two for 34. Foakes
and Chris Woakes nudged for a bit before more rain took us to lunch and that declaration. In the sixth over, England introduced their most threatening new ball bowler (Leach), and it took him just six deliveries to make the first incision. What started as an appeal for LBW soon increased in volume when Alex Lees caught the ball at short leg. Umpire Joel Wilson was unmoved, but DRS showed a small spike on Campbell’s glove. The second wicket two overs later did not require much forensic work as Shamarh Brooks offered a full-blooded edge to give Saqib Mahmood a first of the innings. The scorecard will say caught Root (first slip), but the ball raced to Crawley at second, who reacted well to palm the ball in the air as it burst through his initial attempts at a catch, allowing Root to complete the dismissal and take all the credit. The England captain didn’t have to do much for his second catch either. A delivery short of a length from Mahmood reared up and caught the shoulder of Nkrumah Bonner’s bat, flying straight into Root’s hands at stomach level. At that point the question had to be asked - was this on? Brathwaite led from the front for West Indies and was player of the Test (Getty Images) First innings centurions Brathwaite and Jermaine Blackwood, captain and vice, steadied matters through to tea, on 65 for three. The pair absorbed 411 deliveries in tandem for their 183- run partnership for the fourth wicket earlier in this piece and proving just as tough to crack. The task in front of them was to
see out a more manageable 34 overs, knowing light would almost certainly ensure not all of those would be bowled. But on 150 balls between them, Leach managed to find an edge from a defending Blackwood, straight to Bairstow, crouching in a helmet, at a comically close gully. And when Jason Holder inexplicably bunted Leach to cover - Lawrence with an outstanding one-handed grab just above the turf - England had five to get from the remaining 20 overs (or so). The floodlights came on after drinks, given England access to every minute of the last hour as the sun set around them. But the only one illuminated from above was Brathwaite as he moved to a defiant half-century from 157 deliveries. The series moves on to Grenada for the final Test. One hopes the players will get a chance to scrap with each other to force a series win, rather than the surface. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Sport/ Cricket Cross admits ‘negative’ feelings despite NZ win England struggle again but keep World Cup hopes alive The seamer celebrates getting the wicket of Suzie Bates (Getty) MILLY MCEVOY Kate Cross admitted that England’s narrow one-wicket win over New Zealand has left the changing room deflated despite it keeping alive their hopes of defending their ICC Women’s Cricket World Cup title.
England, led by Cross’s three for 35, had restricted New Zealand to 203 all out, dismissing the last eight batters for 69 runs at Eden Park. But the 2017 champions struggled in their run chase once again, Nat Sciver’s 61 leading the way before an untimely collapse left Noll Anya Shrubsole to hit the winning runs having been sent out to bat in the drizzle with eight still needed. “It’s just about finding ways of winning and we found a way to win today and we’ll go away, review our batting honestly and we’ll review our bowling honestly like we do with every game,” Cross said. “I think it feels like we’ve lost, it feels a little bit like there’s quite a lot of negative chatter around which obviously is not the case, we’ve just won a must-win game of cricket against New Zealand on their home soil at Eden Park with the biggest crowd that we’ve played in front of. “To come away with two points is still massive and we shouldn’t be too disheartened either because we did half of that game very, very well and tournament cricket is all about peaking at the right time. “So, as long as we can keep going and keep making improvements, which I feel like we have since the first couple of games, then hopefully we can get ourselves into that knockout stage.” England must still win their games against Pakistan and Bangladesh to have a chance of qualifying after Australia became the first team to confirm their place in the knockouts. New Zealand must rely on other results going their way but now look set to be dumped out of their home tournament early. And while England came out on top, both Cross and the White Ferns’ vice-captain Amy Satterthwaite cited a failure to put together substantial batting partnerships as the reason the game went down to the wire. The England seamer said: “I think we’ve just not quite been clinical enough. If we look at that performance, I thought we did
that first half very well to restrict New Zealand to just over 200, after the start that they got I thought was a great effort in the field and with the ball. “But we talked so much about partnerships, and we couldn’t quite extend the batting partnerships today, I thought Nat [Stiver] and Heather [Knight] batted well together, but we just needed someone to stay out there and try and see us home. “I think if we’re completely honest, the weather affected the pitch a little bit. It was skidding on a little bit more and I don’t think we adjusted to that as well as we should have done as a batting unit. “The main thing is we’ve got the win on the board, and we’ve got the points that we needed, which I think if you’d have asked us at the start of the day with the weather that was around, we’d have absolutely taken a one-wicket win so we don’t want to be too negative about the fact that we have got that win on the board.” Satterthwaite took over the reins as captain after skipper Sophie Devine was unable to field due to a back injury she picked up batting while bowler Lea Tahuhu pulled up with a hamstring issue. Spinner Frances Mackay took a career-best four for 34 to bring the home favourites back into the contest but New Zealand were ultimately let down by an underwhelming batting performance with Maddy Green left stranded on 52 not out. She said: “The frustrating part is I really felt that we turned a corner against India in the series before this tournament as a group and we started to put some consistent totals on the board around that sort of 260/270 [mark] and everyone was playing their role superbly. “We’ve obviously had some things not go our way today with the likes of Sophie’s injury, we lost Lauren Down coming into this tournament. “But I still back the people that were in this line-up to produce bigger scores than what we have been and I think sometimes we
possibly get a little bit ahead of ourselves and think we need more than we do. “We need to use a bit of guts and determination to take it a little bit deeper to be able to get that score on the board. “I thought Maddy and myself had absorbed a little bit [of pressure] today and were just starting to turn a corner and gain a little bit of momentum and my wicket was really poor timing in that sense and unfortunately, after that, it was a little bit of dominoes.” © ICC Business Corporation FZ LLC 2022 Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л
MONDAY 21 MARCH 2022 Sport Sport news in brief Marc Scott after his successful 3000m run in Belgrade last night (EPA) Ugen and Scott break Britain’s duck in Belgrade Lorraine Ugen and Marc Scott ensured Great Britain avoided leaving the World Indoor Championships empty-handed yesterday. The pair claimed bronze in the long jump and 3000m respectively just as it looked like the squad would return from Serbia without a medal for the first time since 1996. Ugen jumped 6.82m in Belgrade to win her second world indoor bronze, after also coming third in Portland in 2016. She said: “It’s been a little while as I’ve suffered with injuries and was deciding whether to retire or not, not having sponsorship
behind me, but I was like ‘you have to put the work in and do this to get back on the podium’ to prove to myself that I can be back at the elite level again.” Scott ran seven minutes 42.02 seconds to finish behind Ethiopian duo Selemon Barega and Lamecha Girma. He said: “I had it in my head that I wanted a medal and it weighed pretty heavily at times. You never know what’s going to happen in these races. I knew if I could get around a lot of bodies going into the last lap it would be very hard for them to come back past me.” But there was disappointment for defending champion Andrew Pozzi, who failed to make the final of the 60m hurdles at the Stark Arena. He clocked 7.60 seconds in his heat and semi-final but it was not quick enough to advance to the final. PA RFU support for Jones after underwhelming Six Nations Eddie Jones has been given the full backing of the Rugby Football Union despite another disappointing Guinness Six Nations campaign in which England finish third. The RFU has moved quickly to end any doubt over Jones’s future in the wake of Saturday night’s 25-13 defeat by France, which was the third time in five years that England have ended the competition with three losses and comes just 12 months after the Australian head coach survived an inquest into finishing fifth. “Eddie Jones is building a new England team and against a clear strategy we are encouraged by the solid progress the team has made during this Six Nations,” an RFU spokesperson said. “The RFU continues to fully support Eddie, the coaching team and players and we are excited about the summer tour and the progress to rebuild a winning England team.” Jones has called for patience, promising the project will deliver at France 2023. “They’ve got to have some faith. I think I’ve done a reasonable job for England for the past seven years. Am I pleased with the job I’m doing? I’m not pleased with the results. Do I think I’m coaching well? One hundred per cent. I think I’m
coaching well and sometimes you don’t get the results. We’d all like to be winning tournaments and be at the top of the table, but we’re not quite good enough to do that now. But within the next 12 to 14 months, when we prepare for the World Cup, we will be.” Castagne and Maddison fire Leicester to win over Brentford Timothy Castagne and James Maddison each produced superb first-half strikes as Leicester beat Brentford 2-1 at the King Power Stadium and moved into the top half of the Premier League. Belgian full-back Castagne, making his first appearance since December after recovering from a thigh problem, had the home fans on their feet as he collected the ball from by powering a shot into the top corner in the 20th minute to put the Foxes ahead, and Maddison added a delightful free kick 13 minutes later. Having brought some good saves out of Kasper Schmeichel after the break, Brentford pulled a goal back through Yoane Wissa with five minutes of normal time remaining. Schmeichel subsequently dealt with a Tariqe Fosu effort as Brentford searched in vain for an equaliser, and Barnes then sent an effort wide before the final whistle confirmed Leicester as victors. A third victory in four league outings for Brendan Rodgers’s men sees them move up two places to 10th in the table. Thomas Frank’s Bees, who were without Christian Eriksen due to coronavirus, remain 15th, eight points above the relegation zone. Palace thump Everton to book FA Cup semi-final slot Crystal Palace put Everton to the sword with a 4-0 thrashing in the FA Cup quarter-finals to book a last-four meeting with Chelsea at Wembley and help Marc Guehi end the perfect week on another high note. The centre-back shut out Premier League leaders Manchester City on Monday, earned a maiden England call-up three days later and broke the deadlock in the 25th-
minute with a deft header from Michael Olise’s corner to set Patrick Vieira's side on course for a convincing victory. Jean-Philippe Mateta drilled home a Wilf Zaha cutback to double the Eagles lead on 41 minutes, and only a stunning last- ditch tackle by visiting captain Seamus Coleman prevented a second for the French striker before half-time. Everton were again undone 11 minutes from time when Zaha set up Olise and although his freakishly looped shot hit the post, top scorer Zaha was on hand to tap home from close range. Substitute Will Hughes added further gloss with a tap-in three minutes from time to spark “que sera, sera” chants around Seihurst Park. It continues the momentum built in Vieira's debut season in the Palace dugout, with the former Arsenal midfielder unbeaten in his last 19 FA Cup ties and set to lead the Eagles out at Wembley for the semi-final against London rivals Chelsea next month. Defeat piled more misery on opposite number Frank Lampard, who turns his attention back to the Toffees' relegation plight following another day to forget for the Merseyside outfit. Family and famous friends attend Warne’s private funeral Shane Warne’s family and friends were joined by dozens of celebrities at his private funeral, including former England captain Michael Vaughan. The service in Warne’s home city of Melbourne was attended by around 80 guests, including his three children, parents, friends and retired Test captains Mark Taylor, Allan Border and Vaughan. The former leg-spinner, considered one of the greatest cricketers of all time, died of a suspected heart attack while on holiday in Koh Samui, Thailand, on 4 March, aged 52. Television presenter Eddie McGuire, who anchors Australian Football League show Fox Footy, hosted the service, which was also attended by former AFL greats. McGuire described Warne as “Superman” and in quotes reported by the Daily Mail added: “You threw the ball to Warne, you sat in that [Melbourne Cricket Ground] Southern Stand and he did the things you
dreamt of doing as a kid. The magic part about Shane Warne was that he sprinkled his gold dust everywhere he went.” A state memorial will be held at the MCG on 30 March and will be open to the public, with more than 50,000 fans expected to attend via a ballot. It has been reported that Sir Elton John will perform live via video link for the state funeral and that other video tributes will include performances from Ed Sheeran and Coldplay’s Chris Martin. Want your views to be included in The Independent Daily Edition letters page? Email us by tapping here letters@independent.co.uk. Please include your address BACK TO top л